Behçet's Syndrome Overall Damage Index performance and validation in an adult Egyptian cohort.

IF 1.1 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY
Archives of rheumatology Pub Date : 2024-12-12 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2024.10893
Doaa Attia, Lobna Maged
{"title":"Behçet's Syndrome Overall Damage Index performance and validation in an adult Egyptian cohort.","authors":"Doaa Attia, Lobna Maged","doi":"10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2024.10893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the Behçet's Syndrome Overall Damage Index (BODI) in an adult Egyptian cohort.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This longitudinal retrospective cohort study included 282 adult patients (233 males, 49 females; mean age: 35.3±8.7 years; range, 16 to 66 years) with Behçet's disease (BD) between January 1980 and December 2022. BODI was assessed regarding construct validity, sensitivity to change, and intra- and inter-rater reliability. The ability of BODI to discriminate between activity and damage was evaluated. Its performance in another vasculitis syndrome was assessed in 12 patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BODI captured more damage items compared to the Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI). BODI scores were not correlated with disease activity and had poor performance in other vasculitides. BODI had a trend of progressive increment over time. It showed consistence when reassessed by the same rater and by different raters. Some damage items in the study cohort were lacking in BODI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BODI is more comprehensive compared to VDI. It shows good face, construct, and discriminant validity. It is sensitive to change and has good intra- and inter-rater reliability. Newer versions of BODI are recommended to increase score comprehensiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":93884,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rheumatology","volume":"39 4","pages":"607-616"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11883263/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2024.10893","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the Behçet's Syndrome Overall Damage Index (BODI) in an adult Egyptian cohort.

Patients and methods: This longitudinal retrospective cohort study included 282 adult patients (233 males, 49 females; mean age: 35.3±8.7 years; range, 16 to 66 years) with Behçet's disease (BD) between January 1980 and December 2022. BODI was assessed regarding construct validity, sensitivity to change, and intra- and inter-rater reliability. The ability of BODI to discriminate between activity and damage was evaluated. Its performance in another vasculitis syndrome was assessed in 12 patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis.

Results: BODI captured more damage items compared to the Vasculitis Damage Index (VDI). BODI scores were not correlated with disease activity and had poor performance in other vasculitides. BODI had a trend of progressive increment over time. It showed consistence when reassessed by the same rater and by different raters. Some damage items in the study cohort were lacking in BODI.

Conclusion: BODI is more comprehensive compared to VDI. It shows good face, construct, and discriminant validity. It is sensitive to change and has good intra- and inter-rater reliability. Newer versions of BODI are recommended to increase score comprehensiveness.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信