Rehabilitation training robot using mirror therapy for the upper and lower limb after stroke: a prospective cohort study.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Xixi Wu, Xu Qiao, Yudi Xie, Qingyan Yang, Wenting An, Lingfeng Xia, Jiatao Li, Xiao Lu
{"title":"Rehabilitation training robot using mirror therapy for the upper and lower limb after stroke: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Xixi Wu, Xu Qiao, Yudi Xie, Qingyan Yang, Wenting An, Lingfeng Xia, Jiatao Li, Xiao Lu","doi":"10.1186/s12984-025-01590-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This prospective cohort study was designed to investigate and compare the effectiveness of rehabilitation training robots versus conventional rehabilitation training on stroke survivors by monitoring alterations in brain network of stroke patients before and after robot intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between September 2020 and November 2021, stroke patients at four grade-A tertiary hospitals underwent limb rehabilitation training. Of the total of participants, 117 patients received conventional limb rehabilitation, 93 patients participated in upper-limb robot training, and 103 patients underwent lower-limb robot training. The measured outcomes included modified Barthel Index (MBI), Fugl-Meyer assessment subscale (FMA), and manual muscle testing (MMT). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was conducted on 30 patients to assess changes in the brain network. Data were mainly analyzed based on the Intention-to-Treat (ITT) principle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-interventional analysis utilizing linear mixed models in ITT analysis revealed that the robot training group had greater enhancements compared to the conventional limb rehabilitation training group. Notably, the shoulder flexor strength (P = 0.043) was significantly higher in the upper-limb group. On the other hand, hip flexor strength (P < 0.001), hip extensor strength (P < 0.001), knee extensor strength (P = 0.013), ankle dorsiflexion strength (P < 0.001) and ankle plantarflexor strength (P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the lower-limb group. In the upper-limb group, region-of-interest (ROI) -to-ROI analysis revealed enhanced functional connectivity between the left hemisphere's motor control region and the auditory network. ROI-to-ROI analysis primarily showed enhanced interhemispheric functional connectivity in the lower-limb group, specifically between right the hemisphere's motor control region (central opercular cortex) and left hemisphere's primary motor area in the precentral gyrus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>According to our research findings, upper- and lower-limb rehabilitation robots demonstrated great potential in promoting motor function recovery in stroke patients. Robot-assisted training offers an alternative treatment method with comparable efficacy to traditional rehabilitation. Large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800019783).</p>","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":"22 1","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11889811/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01590-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This prospective cohort study was designed to investigate and compare the effectiveness of rehabilitation training robots versus conventional rehabilitation training on stroke survivors by monitoring alterations in brain network of stroke patients before and after robot intervention.

Methods: Between September 2020 and November 2021, stroke patients at four grade-A tertiary hospitals underwent limb rehabilitation training. Of the total of participants, 117 patients received conventional limb rehabilitation, 93 patients participated in upper-limb robot training, and 103 patients underwent lower-limb robot training. The measured outcomes included modified Barthel Index (MBI), Fugl-Meyer assessment subscale (FMA), and manual muscle testing (MMT). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was conducted on 30 patients to assess changes in the brain network. Data were mainly analyzed based on the Intention-to-Treat (ITT) principle.

Results: Post-interventional analysis utilizing linear mixed models in ITT analysis revealed that the robot training group had greater enhancements compared to the conventional limb rehabilitation training group. Notably, the shoulder flexor strength (P = 0.043) was significantly higher in the upper-limb group. On the other hand, hip flexor strength (P < 0.001), hip extensor strength (P < 0.001), knee extensor strength (P = 0.013), ankle dorsiflexion strength (P < 0.001) and ankle plantarflexor strength (P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the lower-limb group. In the upper-limb group, region-of-interest (ROI) -to-ROI analysis revealed enhanced functional connectivity between the left hemisphere's motor control region and the auditory network. ROI-to-ROI analysis primarily showed enhanced interhemispheric functional connectivity in the lower-limb group, specifically between right the hemisphere's motor control region (central opercular cortex) and left hemisphere's primary motor area in the precentral gyrus.

Conclusions: According to our research findings, upper- and lower-limb rehabilitation robots demonstrated great potential in promoting motor function recovery in stroke patients. Robot-assisted training offers an alternative treatment method with comparable efficacy to traditional rehabilitation. Large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these results.

Trial registration: The study was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800019783).

康复训练机器人对中风后上肢和下肢的镜像治疗:一项前瞻性队列研究。
背景:这项前瞻性队列研究旨在通过监测机器人干预前和干预后中风患者大脑网络的变化,研究和比较康复训练机器人和传统康复训练对中风幸存者的效果:这项前瞻性队列研究旨在通过监测机器人干预前后脑卒中患者大脑网络的变化,调查和比较康复训练机器人与传统康复训练对脑卒中幸存者的效果:2020年9月至2021年11月期间,四家甲级三甲医院的脑卒中患者接受了肢体康复训练。在所有参与者中,117 名患者接受了常规肢体康复训练,93 名患者参加了上肢机器人训练,103 名患者接受了下肢机器人训练。测量结果包括改良巴特尔指数(MBI)、Fugl-Meyer评估分量表(FMA)和徒手肌肉测试(MMT)。对 30 名患者进行了功能磁共振成像(fMRI),以评估大脑网络的变化。数据主要根据意向治疗(ITT)原则进行分析:结果:在 ITT 分析中利用线性混合模型进行的干预后分析表明,与传统肢体康复训练组相比,机器人训练组有更大的提高。值得注意的是,上肢组的肩部屈肌力量(P = 0.043)明显提高。另一方面,上肢组的髋关节屈肌力量(P 结论:上肢组的髋关节屈肌力量明显高于下肢组:根据我们的研究结果,上肢和下肢康复机器人在促进脑卒中患者运动功能恢复方面表现出巨大潜力。机器人辅助训练是一种替代治疗方法,其疗效与传统康复训练相当。这些结果需要大规模的随机对照试验来证实:本研究已在中国临床试验注册中心注册(ChiCTR1800019783)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
122
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation considers manuscripts on all aspects of research that result from cross-fertilization of the fields of neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and physical medicine & rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信