Tracing epistemic injustice in global antimicrobial resistance research.

IF 14 1区生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Trends in Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-05 DOI:10.1016/j.tim.2025.02.005

Phaik Yeong Cheah, Sonia Lewycka, Jantina de Vries

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This commentary explores whether there is epistemic injustice in global antimicrobial resistance (AMR) research - who sets priorities, who produces knowledge, and which types of knowledge are valued. We argue that epistemic injustice may have created blind spots in policy. Addressing this requires a commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion.

查看原文本刊更多论文

追踪全球抗菌素耐药性研究中的认知不公。

这篇评论探讨了在全球抗菌素耐药性研究中是否存在认识上的不公正——谁确定优先事项，谁产生知识，以及哪些类型的知识受到重视。我们认为，认识上的不公正可能造成了政策上的盲点。解决这一问题需要致力于多样性、公平性和包容性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Trends in Microbiology 生物-生化与分子生物学

CiteScore

25.30

自引率

0.60%

发文量

193

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Trends in Microbiology serves as a comprehensive, multidisciplinary forum for discussing various aspects of microbiology, spanning cell biology, immunology, genetics, evolution, virology, bacteriology, protozoology, and mycology. In the rapidly evolving field of microbiology, technological advancements, especially in genome sequencing, impact prokaryote biology from pathogens to extremophiles, influencing developments in drugs, vaccines, and industrial enzyme research.