Trait dissociation in borderline personality disorder: influence on immediate therapy outcomes, follow-up assessments, and self-harm patterns.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Ana Macchia, David Mikusky, Cedric Sachser, Annabel Sandra Mueller-Stierlin, Sandra Nickel, Niklas Sanhüter, Birgit Abler
{"title":"Trait dissociation in borderline personality disorder: influence on immediate therapy outcomes, follow-up assessments, and self-harm patterns.","authors":"Ana Macchia, David Mikusky, Cedric Sachser, Annabel Sandra Mueller-Stierlin, Sandra Nickel, Niklas Sanhüter, Birgit Abler","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2025.2461965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Dissociative symptoms are suggested to compete with the effectiveness of psychotherapeutic treatment and frequently co-occur with early life trauma and self-harm patterns, including self-injury, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts, which are characteristic for borderline personality disorder (BPD).<b>Objective:</b> We explore the connections between dissociation and other BPD features like self-harm and childhood traumatization and examine the impact of trait dissociation on both immediate and follow-up psychotherapy outcomes.<b>Method:</b> In this naturalistic prospective evaluation study, we investigated psychopathology including general psychological distress (SCL-90), depression (BDI-II), and borderline-specific pathology (BSL) in 131 patients with BPD pre and post of a certified 8-week inpatient Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT), as well as 3- and 6-month post inpatient treatment. Prior to therapy, we evaluated trait dissociation (Dissociative Experience Scale), early life trauma (Childhood Trauma Questionnaire), and self-harm patterns (clinical interview). We performed a network analysis to explore the interplay between dissociation, self-harm, and childhood traumatization. To analyse the influence of dissociation on treatment outcomes, we employed linear mixed models.<b>Results:</b> Psychopathology (SCL-90, BDI-II and BSL) exhibited significant reductions at post-treatment and follow-up assessments when compared to baseline measurements. Higher levels of trait dissociation were consistently related to higher psychopathology but did not suggest poorer symptom reduction during DBT. However, trait dissociation predicted reduced 6-month follow-up benefits from DBT, regardless of the baseline symptom burden. The network analysis revealed a close association between self-injury and derealization/depersonalization, while the frequency of suicide attempts was more closely connected to childhood emotional abuse, which was identified as a central node of the network.<b>Conclusions:</b> Dissociation was not related to poorer outcomes regarding inpatient DBT. However, trait dissociation predicted reduced follow-up benefits, highlighting the need to address dissociation during psychotherapeutic interventions. Based on the estimated network structure, treating dissociative symptoms could potentially mitigate self-injury while especially childhood emotional abuse was linked with suicide attempts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2461965"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11884097/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2461965","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dissociative symptoms are suggested to compete with the effectiveness of psychotherapeutic treatment and frequently co-occur with early life trauma and self-harm patterns, including self-injury, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts, which are characteristic for borderline personality disorder (BPD).Objective: We explore the connections between dissociation and other BPD features like self-harm and childhood traumatization and examine the impact of trait dissociation on both immediate and follow-up psychotherapy outcomes.Method: In this naturalistic prospective evaluation study, we investigated psychopathology including general psychological distress (SCL-90), depression (BDI-II), and borderline-specific pathology (BSL) in 131 patients with BPD pre and post of a certified 8-week inpatient Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT), as well as 3- and 6-month post inpatient treatment. Prior to therapy, we evaluated trait dissociation (Dissociative Experience Scale), early life trauma (Childhood Trauma Questionnaire), and self-harm patterns (clinical interview). We performed a network analysis to explore the interplay between dissociation, self-harm, and childhood traumatization. To analyse the influence of dissociation on treatment outcomes, we employed linear mixed models.Results: Psychopathology (SCL-90, BDI-II and BSL) exhibited significant reductions at post-treatment and follow-up assessments when compared to baseline measurements. Higher levels of trait dissociation were consistently related to higher psychopathology but did not suggest poorer symptom reduction during DBT. However, trait dissociation predicted reduced 6-month follow-up benefits from DBT, regardless of the baseline symptom burden. The network analysis revealed a close association between self-injury and derealization/depersonalization, while the frequency of suicide attempts was more closely connected to childhood emotional abuse, which was identified as a central node of the network.Conclusions: Dissociation was not related to poorer outcomes regarding inpatient DBT. However, trait dissociation predicted reduced follow-up benefits, highlighting the need to address dissociation during psychotherapeutic interventions. Based on the estimated network structure, treating dissociative symptoms could potentially mitigate self-injury while especially childhood emotional abuse was linked with suicide attempts.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信