Enhanced Blood Vessel Visualization and Accelerated Image Acquisition Using Spiral MRA in Moyamoya Disease: A Comparative Study with Cartesian MRA.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Maoxue Wang, Yongbo Yang, Yujie Yu, Chuyue Chen, Kun Wang, Mahmud Mossa-Basha, Baochen Chu, Pin Lv, Mei Yao, Wen Zhang, Xin Zhang, Zhengyang Zhu, Xiance Zhao, Lei Zhou, Bing Zhang
{"title":"Enhanced Blood Vessel Visualization and Accelerated Image Acquisition Using Spiral MRA in Moyamoya Disease: A Comparative Study with Cartesian MRA.","authors":"Maoxue Wang, Yongbo Yang, Yujie Yu, Chuyue Chen, Kun Wang, Mahmud Mossa-Basha, Baochen Chu, Pin Lv, Mei Yao, Wen Zhang, Xin Zhang, Zhengyang Zhu, Xiance Zhao, Lei Zhou, Bing Zhang","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the blood vessel visualization with spiral MRA (MRAspiral) and compressed SENSE accelerated Cartesian MRA (MRACS) in moyamoya disease (MMD) patients, with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively collected MRAspiral with different acquisition windows (τ = 4, 6, 10 ms), MRACS and DSA in MMD patients. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was measured in the M1, M2, M3, and M4 segments of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) for each MRA sequence. Vessel visualization of the distal MCA, leptomeningeal artery (LMA) collaterals, distal external carotid artery (ECA), and internal carotid artery (ICA) steno-occlusion was qualitatively analyzed using 3- and 4-point likert scales compared to DSA. A linear fixed-effects model was used to determine differences among the four sequences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 98 hemispheres from 55 MMD patients were included. CNR in the M2, M3 and M4 segments of the MCA was not significantly different between MRACS and MRAτ4 or MRAτ6, but it was significantly higher in MRACS than MRAτ10 (M2: P < 0.001, M3: P < 0.001, M4: P = 0.013). MRAspiral sequences provided better visualization of the distal MCA, LMA collaterals and distal ECA compared to MRACS (all P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MRAspiral offers improved vessel visualization in distal arteries with adequate image quality for patients with MMD. Compared to MRACS, MRAspiral can reduce scan time by 32.31% when the τ value is set to 6 ms, while also providing superior image quality.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>Spiral MRA performs well in visualizing collateral vessels in moyamoya disease with shorter scan time.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the blood vessel visualization with spiral MRA (MRAspiral) and compressed SENSE accelerated Cartesian MRA (MRACS) in moyamoya disease (MMD) patients, with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as the reference standard.

Methods: We prospectively collected MRAspiral with different acquisition windows (τ = 4, 6, 10 ms), MRACS and DSA in MMD patients. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was measured in the M1, M2, M3, and M4 segments of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) for each MRA sequence. Vessel visualization of the distal MCA, leptomeningeal artery (LMA) collaterals, distal external carotid artery (ECA), and internal carotid artery (ICA) steno-occlusion was qualitatively analyzed using 3- and 4-point likert scales compared to DSA. A linear fixed-effects model was used to determine differences among the four sequences.

Results: A total of 98 hemispheres from 55 MMD patients were included. CNR in the M2, M3 and M4 segments of the MCA was not significantly different between MRACS and MRAτ4 or MRAτ6, but it was significantly higher in MRACS than MRAτ10 (M2: P < 0.001, M3: P < 0.001, M4: P = 0.013). MRAspiral sequences provided better visualization of the distal MCA, LMA collaterals and distal ECA compared to MRACS (all P < 0.001).

Conclusions: MRAspiral offers improved vessel visualization in distal arteries with adequate image quality for patients with MMD. Compared to MRACS, MRAspiral can reduce scan time by 32.31% when the τ value is set to 6 ms, while also providing superior image quality.

Advances in knowledge: Spiral MRA performs well in visualizing collateral vessels in moyamoya disease with shorter scan time.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信