Comparative Assessment of Physical Layer Performance: ATSC 3.0 vs. 5G Broadcast in Laboratory and Field Tests

IF 3.2 1区计算机科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC

IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1109/TBC.2024.3482183

Sunhyoung Kwon;Seok-Ki Ahn;Sungjun Ahn;Sungho Jeon;Sesh Simha;Mark Aitken;Anindya Saha;Prashant M. Maru;Parag Naik;Sung-Ik Park

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of the physical layer performance of ATSC 3.0 and 3GPP 5G Broadcast through comprehensive laboratory and field tests. The study evaluates various reception scenarios, including fixed and mobile environments and various channel conditions, such as additive white Gaussian noise and mobile channels. Key performance metrics such as threshold of visibility (ToV) and erroneous second ratio (ESR) are measured to assess the reception quality of each standard. The results demonstrate that ATSC 3.0 generally outperforms 5G Broadcast due to its advanced bit-interleaved coded modulation and time interleaving techniques, effectively mitigating burst errors in mobile channels.

查看原文本刊更多论文

物理层性能的比较评估：实验室和现场测试中的ATSC 3.0与5G广播

通过综合实验室和现场测试，对ATSC 3.0和3GPP 5G广播的物理层性能进行了对比分析。该研究评估了各种接收场景，包括固定和移动环境以及各种信道条件，如加性高斯白噪声和移动信道。测量关键性能指标，如可见阈值（ToV）和错误秒比（ESR），以评估每个标准的接收质量。结果表明，由于采用了先进的比特交错编码调制和时间交错技术，ATSC 3.0总体上优于5G广播，有效地减轻了移动信道中的突发错误。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting 工程技术-电信学

CiteScore

9.40

自引率

31.10%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Society’s Field of Interest is “Devices, equipment, techniques and systems related to broadcast technology, including the production, distribution, transmission, and propagation aspects.” In addition to this formal FOI statement, which is used to provide guidance to the Publications Committee in the selection of content, the AdCom has further resolved that “broadcast systems includes all aspects of transmission, propagation, and reception.”