Is perceived safety a prerequisite for the relationship between green space availability, and the use and perceived comfort of green space?

IF 2.4 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Ruoyu Wang , Yuxiao Jiang , Dongwei Liu , Huiwen Peng , Mengqiu Cao , Yao Yao
{"title":"Is perceived safety a prerequisite for the relationship between green space availability, and the use and perceived comfort of green space?","authors":"Ruoyu Wang ,&nbsp;Yuxiao Jiang ,&nbsp;Dongwei Liu ,&nbsp;Huiwen Peng ,&nbsp;Mengqiu Cao ,&nbsp;Yao Yao","doi":"10.1016/j.wss.2025.100247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, many researchers have argued that both the availability of green space (GS) and perceived neighbourhood safety may be prerequisites for the use of GS, but empirical findings remain inconsistent. This study explores how perceived neighbourhood safety moderates the associations between the availability of neighbourhood GS and residents’ use of GS, using survey data collected in Guangzhou, China. The Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (overall amount of greenness), park accessibility and a measure of Street View Greenness (eye-level greenness) were used to estimate two types of GS availability (overall vs. eye-level). As shown by the results of the multilevel models, eye-level greenness was positively associated with the use of and perceived comfort of GS for those respondents with a higher level of perceived neighbourhood safety; it was negatively related to the use and perceived comfort of GS in the case of respondents with a lower level of perceived neighbourhood safety. In addition, the overall amount of greenness was positively associated with the use and perceived comfort of GS regardless of the level of perceived neighbourhood safety. Our findings suggest that perceived safety may be a potential prerequisite for positive associations between the availability of GSS at eye level and the use of and perceived comfort of GS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52616,"journal":{"name":"Wellbeing Space and Society","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100247"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wellbeing Space and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666558125000132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, many researchers have argued that both the availability of green space (GS) and perceived neighbourhood safety may be prerequisites for the use of GS, but empirical findings remain inconsistent. This study explores how perceived neighbourhood safety moderates the associations between the availability of neighbourhood GS and residents’ use of GS, using survey data collected in Guangzhou, China. The Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (overall amount of greenness), park accessibility and a measure of Street View Greenness (eye-level greenness) were used to estimate two types of GS availability (overall vs. eye-level). As shown by the results of the multilevel models, eye-level greenness was positively associated with the use of and perceived comfort of GS for those respondents with a higher level of perceived neighbourhood safety; it was negatively related to the use and perceived comfort of GS in the case of respondents with a lower level of perceived neighbourhood safety. In addition, the overall amount of greenness was positively associated with the use and perceived comfort of GS regardless of the level of perceived neighbourhood safety. Our findings suggest that perceived safety may be a potential prerequisite for positive associations between the availability of GSS at eye level and the use of and perceived comfort of GS.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wellbeing Space and Society
Wellbeing Space and Society Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
124 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信