Giovanna Fico, Marta Bort, Meritxell Gonzalez-Campos, Giulia D'Alessandro, Michele De Prisco, Vincenzo Oliva, Gerard Anmella, Constanza Sommerhoff, Eduard Vieta, Andrea Murru
{"title":"Predominant Polarity for Enhanced Phenotyping and Personalized Treatment of Bipolar Disorder: A Narrative Review on Recent Findings.","authors":"Giovanna Fico, Marta Bort, Meritxell Gonzalez-Campos, Giulia D'Alessandro, Michele De Prisco, Vincenzo Oliva, Gerard Anmella, Constanza Sommerhoff, Eduard Vieta, Andrea Murru","doi":"10.1007/s11920-025-01592-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This paper explores Predominant Polarity (PP) in Bipolar Disorder (BD), defined as the predominance of either manic or depressive episodes over a patient's course of illness. We examine its clinical relevance, neurobiological foundations, and potential for guiding personalized treatment strategies. The review seeks to determine whether PP is a reliable course specifier and how it can be utilized to improve clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>PP has a significant impact on prognosis and treatment planning in BD. Manic and depressive PP are associated with distinct clinical and neurobiological profiles of BD, while individuals without a clear predominance of either episode type represent a more severe to-treat subgroup of patients. The development of the Polarity Index (PI) facilitates treatment decisions based on PP. PP offers a valuable framework for refining BD treatment and understanding its complexity. Future research should focus on refining PP definitions, validating neurobiological markers, and integrating these insights into comprehensive treatment models to improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11057,"journal":{"name":"Current Psychiatry Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Psychiatry Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-025-01592-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: This paper explores Predominant Polarity (PP) in Bipolar Disorder (BD), defined as the predominance of either manic or depressive episodes over a patient's course of illness. We examine its clinical relevance, neurobiological foundations, and potential for guiding personalized treatment strategies. The review seeks to determine whether PP is a reliable course specifier and how it can be utilized to improve clinical outcomes.
Recent findings: PP has a significant impact on prognosis and treatment planning in BD. Manic and depressive PP are associated with distinct clinical and neurobiological profiles of BD, while individuals without a clear predominance of either episode type represent a more severe to-treat subgroup of patients. The development of the Polarity Index (PI) facilitates treatment decisions based on PP. PP offers a valuable framework for refining BD treatment and understanding its complexity. Future research should focus on refining PP definitions, validating neurobiological markers, and integrating these insights into comprehensive treatment models to improve patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
This journal aims to review the most important, recently published research in psychiatry. By providing clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts, the journal intends to serve all those involved in the care of those affected by psychiatric disorders.
We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as anxiety, medicopsychiatric disorders, and schizophrenia and other related psychotic disorders. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.