Outcomes of Pediatric Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Using Dual-Lumen or Multisite Cannulation: Extracorporeal Life Support Database Study, 2000-2019.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Jessica A Barreto, Pingping Qu, Ravi R Thiagarajan, John K McGuire, Thomas V Brogan
{"title":"Outcomes of Pediatric Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Using Dual-Lumen or Multisite Cannulation: Extracorporeal Life Support Database Study, 2000-2019.","authors":"Jessica A Barreto, Pingping Qu, Ravi R Thiagarajan, John K McGuire, Thomas V Brogan","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In children reported to the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry, to compare mortality, the need for additional cannulas, and complications associated with dual-lumen (DL) or multisite cannulation for venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multicenter retrospective study using the ELSO registry.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Centers reporting to ELSO between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2019.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Children 28 days to 18 years old supported with venovenous ECMO.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>We performed univariate and multivariable regression analyses to determine the association between venovenous ECMO cannulation strategy and in-hospital mortality, ECMO duration, and need for additional cannulas. We also compared the frequency of venovenous ECMO complications using univariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We identified a cohort of 2034 patients, of whom 1441 (71%) were supported with DL. Support with DL, as opposed to multisite cannulation, was associated with median (interquartile range) of younger age (23 mo [6-89 mo] vs. 147 mo [64-189 mo]; p < 0.001). We failed to identify an association between in-hospital mortality and whether DL or multisite cannulation had been used (393/1441 [27%] vs. 184/593 [31%]); unadjusted and adjusted risk ratio (aRR) of death using DL as the reference group of 1.1 (95% CI, 0.7-1.9; p = 0.70). The other analyses failed to identify an association between cannulation type, ECMO duration, and the use of additional cannulas. ECMO complications were similar except for more frequent neurologic determination of death in the multisite group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the 2000-2019 ELSO pediatric dataset, we failed to identify an association between venovenous ECMO cannulation type-DL or multisite-and greater aRR of ECMO outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003713","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In children reported to the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry, to compare mortality, the need for additional cannulas, and complications associated with dual-lumen (DL) or multisite cannulation for venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

Design: Multicenter retrospective study using the ELSO registry.

Setting: Centers reporting to ELSO between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2019.

Patients: Children 28 days to 18 years old supported with venovenous ECMO.

Interventions: We performed univariate and multivariable regression analyses to determine the association between venovenous ECMO cannulation strategy and in-hospital mortality, ECMO duration, and need for additional cannulas. We also compared the frequency of venovenous ECMO complications using univariate analysis.

Measurements and main results: We identified a cohort of 2034 patients, of whom 1441 (71%) were supported with DL. Support with DL, as opposed to multisite cannulation, was associated with median (interquartile range) of younger age (23 mo [6-89 mo] vs. 147 mo [64-189 mo]; p < 0.001). We failed to identify an association between in-hospital mortality and whether DL or multisite cannulation had been used (393/1441 [27%] vs. 184/593 [31%]); unadjusted and adjusted risk ratio (aRR) of death using DL as the reference group of 1.1 (95% CI, 0.7-1.9; p = 0.70). The other analyses failed to identify an association between cannulation type, ECMO duration, and the use of additional cannulas. ECMO complications were similar except for more frequent neurologic determination of death in the multisite group.

Conclusions: In the 2000-2019 ELSO pediatric dataset, we failed to identify an association between venovenous ECMO cannulation type-DL or multisite-and greater aRR of ECMO outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
991
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信