Active surveillance for low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a web-survey on clinician readiness for change.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
European Thyroid Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-17 Print Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1530/ETJ-25-0013
Grigoris Effraimidis, Eleni Sazakli, Olga Karapanou, Katerina Saltiki, Marina Michalaki
{"title":"Active surveillance for low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a web-survey on clinician readiness for change.","authors":"Grigoris Effraimidis, Eleni Sazakli, Olga Karapanou, Katerina Saltiki, Marina Michalaki","doi":"10.1530/ETJ-25-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Current guidelines emphasize active surveillance (AS) over immediate surgery for low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinomas (PTMCs). Alternative minimally invasive treatments, such as thermal ablation, are being explored. If thyroidectomy is performed, lobectomy is preferred and radioactive iodine (RAI) remnant ablation is not routinely recommended for low-risk PTMC patients.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess the approach of Greek endocrinologists toward AS and the management of low-risk PTMCs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based survey was conducted among members of the Hellenic Endocrine Society (HES). Two clinical scenarios involving a 60-year-old woman with low-risk PTMC were analyzed. Surveyed endocrinologists were asked whether they would recommend AS, thermal ablation, lobectomy or total thyroidectomy as primary treatment; and if total thyroidectomy was performed in this case, whether they would recommend RAI ablation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 201 endocrinologists (25% of HES members) participated. As primary treatment for low-risk PTMC, 46.8% recommended total thyroidectomy, 31.3% chose AS, 20.9% opted for lobectomy and 1.0% selected thermal ablation. If total thyroidectomy was performed, 95% considered RAI ablation unlikely and only 5% would use RAI. Demographic characteristics, including age, sex, experience and geographic location, did not significantly influence these choices. The primary reason cited by endocrinologists for noncompliance is skepticism about implementing the guidelines, likely stemming from resource limitations and educational gaps.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One-third of Greek endocrinologists prefer AS for managing low-risk PTMCs. More time and effort may be needed to further shift their clinical approach. Insights from our web survey aim to reduce overtreatment in low-risk PTMC management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12159,"journal":{"name":"European Thyroid Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Thyroid Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/ETJ-25-0013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Current guidelines emphasize active surveillance (AS) over immediate surgery for low-risk papillary thyroid microcarcinomas (PTMCs). Alternative minimally invasive treatments, such as thermal ablation, are being explored. If thyroidectomy is performed, lobectomy is preferred and radioactive iodine (RAI) remnant ablation is not routinely recommended for low-risk PTMC patients.

Aim: This study aimed to assess the approach of Greek endocrinologists toward AS and the management of low-risk PTMCs.

Methods: A web-based survey was conducted among members of the Hellenic Endocrine Society (HES). Two clinical scenarios involving a 60-year-old woman with low-risk PTMC were analyzed. Surveyed endocrinologists were asked whether they would recommend AS, thermal ablation, lobectomy or total thyroidectomy as primary treatment; and if total thyroidectomy was performed in this case, whether they would recommend RAI ablation.

Results: A total of 201 endocrinologists (25% of HES members) participated. As primary treatment for low-risk PTMC, 46.8% recommended total thyroidectomy, 31.3% chose AS, 20.9% opted for lobectomy and 1.0% selected thermal ablation. If total thyroidectomy was performed, 95% considered RAI ablation unlikely and only 5% would use RAI. Demographic characteristics, including age, sex, experience and geographic location, did not significantly influence these choices. The primary reason cited by endocrinologists for noncompliance is skepticism about implementing the guidelines, likely stemming from resource limitations and educational gaps.

Conclusion: One-third of Greek endocrinologists prefer AS for managing low-risk PTMCs. More time and effort may be needed to further shift their clinical approach. Insights from our web survey aim to reduce overtreatment in low-risk PTMC management.

低风险甲状腺乳头状微癌的主动监测:关于临床医生对变革的准备程度的网络调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Thyroid Journal
European Thyroid Journal Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: The ''European Thyroid Journal'' publishes papers reporting original research in basic, translational and clinical thyroidology. Original contributions cover all aspects of the field, from molecular and cellular biology to immunology and biochemistry, from physiology to pathology, and from pediatric to adult thyroid diseases with a special focus on thyroid cancer. Readers also benefit from reviews by noted experts, which highlight especially active areas of current research. The journal will further publish formal guidelines in the field, produced and endorsed by the European Thyroid Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信