Validation of the polymyalgia rheumatica-activity score: A prospective cohort study

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Lien Moreel , Michaël Doumen , Albrecht Betrains , Ellen De Langhe , Daniel Blockmans , Steven Vanderschueren
{"title":"Validation of the polymyalgia rheumatica-activity score: A prospective cohort study","authors":"Lien Moreel ,&nbsp;Michaël Doumen ,&nbsp;Albrecht Betrains ,&nbsp;Ellen De Langhe ,&nbsp;Daniel Blockmans ,&nbsp;Steven Vanderschueren","doi":"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To validate the polymyalgia rheumatica-activity score (PMR-AS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Prospective cohort study at the University Hospitals Leuven (Belgium) between July 2022 and December 2023. We created a new alternative PMR-AS in which ability to elevate the upper limbs (EUL) was replaced by visual analogue scale (VAS) of functionality and both the severity and the duration of stiffness were evaluated. The discriminatory capacity for detecting active disease of the PMR-AS, the change in PMR-AS and several alternative scores were assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and compared using Delong's tests. GEE-logistic prediction models were used to correct for repeated measures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 133 PMR patients (419 visits). PMR-AS had a good discriminatory power with an AUC of 0.938 and an optimal cut-off point of 11.0 with corresponding sensitivity of 87 % and specificity of 87 %. The change in PMR-AS (AUC 0.862), clinical-PMR-AS (AUC 0.928) and imputed-PMR-AS (AUC 0.928) significantly performed worse in detecting active disease (all p≤0.010). The ESR-PMR-AS also tended to have a lower discriminatory capacity (AUC 0.932, p=0.050). Our alternative PMR-AS had a higher AUC (AUC 0.948, p=0.010) with an optimal cut-off point of 13.5 and corresponding sensitivity of 87 % and specificity of 88 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>PMR-AS had a good discriminatory capacity for detecting active disease, but the alternative PMR-AS performed slightly better. Alternative activity scores which do not require the use of CRP performed slightly worse but can be used in case of treatment with glucocorticoid-sparing agents affecting the CRP level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21715,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","volume":"72 ","pages":"Article 152695"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049017225000666","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To validate the polymyalgia rheumatica-activity score (PMR-AS).

Methods

Prospective cohort study at the University Hospitals Leuven (Belgium) between July 2022 and December 2023. We created a new alternative PMR-AS in which ability to elevate the upper limbs (EUL) was replaced by visual analogue scale (VAS) of functionality and both the severity and the duration of stiffness were evaluated. The discriminatory capacity for detecting active disease of the PMR-AS, the change in PMR-AS and several alternative scores were assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) and compared using Delong's tests. GEE-logistic prediction models were used to correct for repeated measures.

Results

We included 133 PMR patients (419 visits). PMR-AS had a good discriminatory power with an AUC of 0.938 and an optimal cut-off point of 11.0 with corresponding sensitivity of 87 % and specificity of 87 %. The change in PMR-AS (AUC 0.862), clinical-PMR-AS (AUC 0.928) and imputed-PMR-AS (AUC 0.928) significantly performed worse in detecting active disease (all p≤0.010). The ESR-PMR-AS also tended to have a lower discriminatory capacity (AUC 0.932, p=0.050). Our alternative PMR-AS had a higher AUC (AUC 0.948, p=0.010) with an optimal cut-off point of 13.5 and corresponding sensitivity of 87 % and specificity of 88 %.

Conclusion

PMR-AS had a good discriminatory capacity for detecting active disease, but the alternative PMR-AS performed slightly better. Alternative activity scores which do not require the use of CRP performed slightly worse but can be used in case of treatment with glucocorticoid-sparing agents affecting the CRP level.
多肌痛风湿病活动评分的验证:一项前瞻性队列研究
目的验证多肌痛风湿病活动评分(PMR-AS)的有效性。方法:2022年7月至2023年12月在比利时鲁汶大学医院进行前瞻性队列研究。我们创建了一种新的替代PMR-AS,其中上肢提升能力(EUL)被功能视觉模拟量表(VAS)取代,并评估了僵硬的严重程度和持续时间。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)评估PMR-AS对活动性疾病的鉴别能力、PMR-AS的变化和几个备选评分,并采用Delong试验进行比较。使用GEE-logistic预测模型对重复测量进行校正。结果纳入133例PMR患者(419次就诊)。PMR-AS具有良好的鉴别能力,AUC为0.938,最佳截断点为11.0,相应的灵敏度为87%,特异性为87%。PMR-AS (AUC 0.862)、临床-PMR-AS (AUC 0.928)和输入-PMR-AS (AUC 0.928)的变化对活动性疾病的检测效果较差(p均≤0.010)。ESR-PMR-AS的鉴别能力也趋于较低(AUC 0.932, p=0.050)。我们的替代PMR-AS具有更高的AUC (AUC 0.948, p=0.010),最佳截断点为13.5,相应的灵敏度为87%,特异性为88%。结论PMR-AS对活动性疾病有较好的鉴别能力,但替代PMR-AS的鉴别能力稍好。不需要使用CRP的替代活动评分表现稍差,但可以在使用影响CRP水平的糖皮质激素保留剂治疗的情况下使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism provides access to the highest-quality clinical, therapeutic and translational research about arthritis, rheumatology and musculoskeletal disorders that affect the joints and connective tissue. Each bimonthly issue includes articles giving you the latest diagnostic criteria, consensus statements, systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as clinical and translational research studies. Read this journal for the latest groundbreaking research and to gain insights from scientists and clinicians on the management and treatment of musculoskeletal and autoimmune rheumatologic diseases. The journal is of interest to rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, internal medicine physicians, immunologists and specialists in bone and mineral metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信