A gaze into the void: Anticipatory saccades toward prevented events

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY
Solveig Tonn, Janna Teigeler, Roland Pfister, Matthias Gamer
{"title":"A gaze into the void: Anticipatory saccades toward prevented events","authors":"Solveig Tonn,&nbsp;Janna Teigeler,&nbsp;Roland Pfister,&nbsp;Matthias Gamer","doi":"10.3758/s13414-025-03019-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It is an open question how prevented events are represented in the human cognitive system—are they represented like produced events or are they represented in a different format? Here, we propose that seemingly contradictory observations on this question can be unified by assuming different time courses for production and prevention actions. Evidence from two experiments in the anticipatory saccades paradigm supported this model. Specifically, our results suggest that prevented events might be represented like produced events during action selection and execution, whereas their representation dissolves rapidly during action monitoring. In other words, the representation of prevented events reflects a two-step process: An initial affirmative representation is followed by later negation. Preregistrations, data, and analysis scripts for all experiments are available online (https://osf.io/m3veh/).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55433,"journal":{"name":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","volume":"87 3","pages":"848 - 861"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13414-025-03019-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13414-025-03019-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is an open question how prevented events are represented in the human cognitive system—are they represented like produced events or are they represented in a different format? Here, we propose that seemingly contradictory observations on this question can be unified by assuming different time courses for production and prevention actions. Evidence from two experiments in the anticipatory saccades paradigm supported this model. Specifically, our results suggest that prevented events might be represented like produced events during action selection and execution, whereas their representation dissolves rapidly during action monitoring. In other words, the representation of prevented events reflects a two-step process: An initial affirmative representation is followed by later negation. Preregistrations, data, and analysis scripts for all experiments are available online (https://osf.io/m3veh/).

凝视虚空:对被阻止的事件进行预期的扫视。
在人类的认知系统中,被阻止的事件是如何被表征的,这是一个悬而未决的问题——它们是像产生的事件一样被表征,还是以不同的形式被表征?在这里,我们提出,可以通过假设不同的生产和预防行动的时间过程来统一这个问题上看似矛盾的观察结果。来自预期扫视范式的两个实验的证据支持这一模型。具体来说,我们的研究结果表明,在行动选择和执行过程中,被阻止的事件可能会像产生的事件一样表示,而在行动监控过程中,它们的表示会迅速消失。换句话说,对被阻止的事件的表征反映了一个两步过程:最初的肯定表征之后是后来的否定表征。所有实验的预注册、数据和分析脚本都可以在网上获得(https://osf.io/m3veh/)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
197
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics is an official journal of the Psychonomic Society. It spans all areas of research in sensory processes, perception, attention, and psychophysics. Most articles published are reports of experimental work; the journal also presents theoretical, integrative, and evaluative reviews. Commentary on issues of importance to researchers appears in a special section of the journal. Founded in 1966 as Perception & Psychophysics, the journal assumed its present name in 2009.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信