A randomized comparative effectiveness trial to evaluate two programs for promotion of physical activity after spinal cord injury in manual wheelchair users.

IF 2.3 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2025-02-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2025.1504840
Jenna M Martinez, Lisa L Haubert, Valerie J Eberly, Walter B Weiss, Jeffery W Rankin
{"title":"A randomized comparative effectiveness trial to evaluate two programs for promotion of physical activity after spinal cord injury in manual wheelchair users.","authors":"Jenna M Martinez, Lisa L Haubert, Valerie J Eberly, Walter B Weiss, Jeffery W Rankin","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2025.1504840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goal of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a novel whole of day activity accumulation (WODAA) physical exercise program. WODAA physical activity and physiological outcomes were compared to outcomes from individuals using a traditional planned arm crank exercise (PACE) program. Both programs included progressive exercise instruction and goal setting over a 4-month period, and utilization of a wrist-worn activity monitor (Fitbit Blaze/Versa, Fitbit Inc., San Francisco, CA).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Longitudinal, randomized, comparative effectiveness trial with collaborative goal setting.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Research laboratory at a rehabilitation hospital and in participants' homes and communities.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Forty-nine manual wheelchair users with paraplegia.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Physical activity measurements and cardiometabolic data were collected before, during, and after the program. The primary measures were amount of daily arm activity (Steps) and time spent in different activity and heart rate zones.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relative to baseline measures, participants in the WODAA group had significantly more daily arm movement/propulsion activity (Steps) and time spent in the Fairly and Very Active Zones and the Cardio Heart Rate Zone compared to those in the PACE group over the final month of the intervention (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Minutes spent in other Activity and Heart Rate Zones were similar between groups. At final evaluation, diastolic blood pressure after a 6-Minute Push Test was significantly lower in the WODAA group, while no differences were found in distance traveled, systolic, or pre-test diastolic blood pressures. Metabolic bloodwork and shoulder pain scores did not change and were similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Depending on the measure used, these findings suggest that a WODAA approach to PA is comparable or more effective than a traditional PACE program in promoting physical activity in low-active manual wheelchair users with paraplegia.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":"7 ","pages":"1504840"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11861549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1504840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a novel whole of day activity accumulation (WODAA) physical exercise program. WODAA physical activity and physiological outcomes were compared to outcomes from individuals using a traditional planned arm crank exercise (PACE) program. Both programs included progressive exercise instruction and goal setting over a 4-month period, and utilization of a wrist-worn activity monitor (Fitbit Blaze/Versa, Fitbit Inc., San Francisco, CA).

Design: Longitudinal, randomized, comparative effectiveness trial with collaborative goal setting.

Setting: Research laboratory at a rehabilitation hospital and in participants' homes and communities.

Participants: Forty-nine manual wheelchair users with paraplegia.

Outcome measures: Physical activity measurements and cardiometabolic data were collected before, during, and after the program. The primary measures were amount of daily arm activity (Steps) and time spent in different activity and heart rate zones.

Results: Relative to baseline measures, participants in the WODAA group had significantly more daily arm movement/propulsion activity (Steps) and time spent in the Fairly and Very Active Zones and the Cardio Heart Rate Zone compared to those in the PACE group over the final month of the intervention (p < 0.05). Minutes spent in other Activity and Heart Rate Zones were similar between groups. At final evaluation, diastolic blood pressure after a 6-Minute Push Test was significantly lower in the WODAA group, while no differences were found in distance traveled, systolic, or pre-test diastolic blood pressures. Metabolic bloodwork and shoulder pain scores did not change and were similar between groups.

Conclusion: Depending on the measure used, these findings suggest that a WODAA approach to PA is comparable or more effective than a traditional PACE program in promoting physical activity in low-active manual wheelchair users with paraplegia.

研究目的本研究旨在确定新颖的全日活动累积(WODAA)体育锻炼计划的有效性。将 WODAA 的身体活动和生理结果与使用传统有计划曲臂运动(PACE)计划的个人结果进行比较。两项计划均包括为期 4 个月的渐进式锻炼指导和目标设定,以及腕戴式活动监测器(Fitbit Blaze/Versa,Fitbit 公司,加利福尼亚州旧金山)的使用:设计:带有合作目标设定的纵向、随机、比较效果试验:地点:康复医院的研究实验室以及参与者的家中和社区:结果测量:结果测量:在计划实施前、实施过程中和实施后收集体力活动测量数据和心脏代谢数据。主要测量指标为每日手臂活动量(步数)以及在不同活动区和心率区所花费的时间:结果:与基线测量值相比,在干预的最后一个月,WODAA 组的参与者与 PACE 组的参与者相比,每天手臂运动/推进活动量(步数)以及在相当活跃区、非常活跃区和有氧心率区所花费的时间都显著增加(p 结论:在干预的最后一个月,WODAA 组的参与者与 PACE 组的参与者相比,每天手臂运动/推进活动量(步数)以及在相当活跃区、非常活跃区和有氧心率区所花费的时间都显著增加:这些研究结果表明,在促进截瘫手动轮椅低活动量使用者的体育锻炼方面,WODAA 方法与传统的 PACE 计划效果相当或更有效,具体取决于所使用的衡量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信