Sebastian Stoia, Anca Ciurea, Mihaela Băciuț, Simion Bran, Gabriel Armencea, Emil Boțan, Manuela Lenghel, Tiberiu Tamaș, Rareș Mocan, Daniel Leucuța, Grigore Băciuț, Cristian Dinu
{"title":"Comparative Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound, MRI, and Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy in the Preoperative Evaluation of Parotid Gland Tumors.","authors":"Sebastian Stoia, Anca Ciurea, Mihaela Băciuț, Simion Bran, Gabriel Armencea, Emil Boțan, Manuela Lenghel, Tiberiu Tamaș, Rareș Mocan, Daniel Leucuța, Grigore Băciuț, Cristian Dinu","doi":"10.3390/jcm14041342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The objective of this study was to compare the value of ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the preoperative evaluation of parotid tumors. <b>Methods:</b> A three-year prospective study, including 35 patients, was conducted. Preoperative ultrasound, MRI, and US-guided FNAB were performed on each patient, after which an imaging and cytological diagnosis was obtained. Each patient underwent surgical treatment. The imaging and cytological diagnoses were compared with the histopathological reports. <b>Results:</b> Ultrasound and MRI showed the same diagnostic performance in discriminating benign from malignant parotid tumors: sensitivity-80%, specificity-97%, and accuracy-94%. In this regard, FNAB registered a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 100%, 97%, and 97%, respectively. US, MRI, and FNAB were recorded as having high diagnostic accuracy in the detection of pleomorphic adenoma and Warthin tumors. <b>Conclusions:</b> Ultrasound and US-guided FNAB allow for the preoperative differential diagnosis of parotid tumors located in the superficial lobe. When US and FNAB results are inconclusive, MRI becomes mandatory.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14041342","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The objective of this study was to compare the value of ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the preoperative evaluation of parotid tumors. Methods: A three-year prospective study, including 35 patients, was conducted. Preoperative ultrasound, MRI, and US-guided FNAB were performed on each patient, after which an imaging and cytological diagnosis was obtained. Each patient underwent surgical treatment. The imaging and cytological diagnoses were compared with the histopathological reports. Results: Ultrasound and MRI showed the same diagnostic performance in discriminating benign from malignant parotid tumors: sensitivity-80%, specificity-97%, and accuracy-94%. In this regard, FNAB registered a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 100%, 97%, and 97%, respectively. US, MRI, and FNAB were recorded as having high diagnostic accuracy in the detection of pleomorphic adenoma and Warthin tumors. Conclusions: Ultrasound and US-guided FNAB allow for the preoperative differential diagnosis of parotid tumors located in the superficial lobe. When US and FNAB results are inconclusive, MRI becomes mandatory.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals.
Unique features of this journal:
manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes.
There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.