Meta-Synthesis of Professional Development Researches for In-Service Science Teachers

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Filiz Gülhan
{"title":"Meta-Synthesis of Professional Development Researches for In-Service Science Teachers","authors":"Filiz Gülhan","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Since science education is a field that is open to current developments due to its nature, science educators need to be in a professional development process that frequently updates themselves. In this study, a metasynthesis of studies focusing on in-service professional development for science teachers was made. Content analysis, one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the examination of 37 articles that met the criteria. It had been observed that descriptive studies the current situations are mostly on “general evaluation of in-service professional development programs”. It has been found that negative thoughts are at the forefront in the results of research findings in this aim. It has been determined that the most frequently studied themes involving experimental procedure researches on professional development practices for teachers are “in-service training practice and evaluation” and “collaborative practices” and positive results have been obtained from these studies. The theme of “collaboration” for science teachers' professional development has come to the fore in both descriptive and involving experimental procedure research. In the light of the results of the research, suggestions were made with the idea that there should be more studies that examine “the teacher as a part of a social structure” rather than “individual professional development” prepared by considering the teacher as an individual separate from the student and the school.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since science education is a field that is open to current developments due to its nature, science educators need to be in a professional development process that frequently updates themselves. In this study, a metasynthesis of studies focusing on in-service professional development for science teachers was made. Content analysis, one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the examination of 37 articles that met the criteria. It had been observed that descriptive studies the current situations are mostly on “general evaluation of in-service professional development programs”. It has been found that negative thoughts are at the forefront in the results of research findings in this aim. It has been determined that the most frequently studied themes involving experimental procedure researches on professional development practices for teachers are “in-service training practice and evaluation” and “collaborative practices” and positive results have been obtained from these studies. The theme of “collaboration” for science teachers' professional development has come to the fore in both descriptive and involving experimental procedure research. In the light of the results of the research, suggestions were made with the idea that there should be more studies that examine “the teacher as a part of a social structure” rather than “individual professional development” prepared by considering the teacher as an individual separate from the student and the school.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信