Enable families with donor-conceived children to tailor their family story. Recommendations for policy and practice regarding legal age limits for accessing donor information in The Netherlands.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Human Fertility Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1080/14647273.2025.2470360
A Indekeu, I van Nistelrooij, N O M Woestenburg, A J B M Maas
{"title":"Enable families with donor-conceived children to tailor their family story. Recommendations for policy and practice regarding legal age limits for accessing donor information in The Netherlands.","authors":"A Indekeu, I van Nistelrooij, N O M Woestenburg, A J B M Maas","doi":"10.1080/14647273.2025.2470360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2020, the Dutch government issued a call to investigate age limits for donor-conceived people to access donor information because there was insufficient justification for such limits in the Dutch law. This question is equally important in a changing landscape of donor conception due to searching using direct-to-consumer genetic tests and social media. This paper describes recommendations for policy and practice based on an interdisciplinary (ethical, legal, psychosocial and empirical) research. Findings show that no age limits can be adequately justified, including the current ones. Consequently, we recommended modification of the law by dropping age limits and by making donor information accessible upon the birth of a donor-conceived person. Moreover, we set forth recommendations for due diligence in providing donor information. Integrating donor information into one's life's story is a gradual process that should be tailored to a child's development and individual needs. Because this process is more than a single moment of accessing donor information, we see parents as being best suited to align accessing donor information with their child's needs. We recommend that donor-conceived people, parents and donors are given support in this process, provided by professionals with experience and knowledge about donor conception.</p>","PeriodicalId":13006,"journal":{"name":"Human Fertility","volume":"28 1","pages":"2470360"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Fertility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2025.2470360","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2020, the Dutch government issued a call to investigate age limits for donor-conceived people to access donor information because there was insufficient justification for such limits in the Dutch law. This question is equally important in a changing landscape of donor conception due to searching using direct-to-consumer genetic tests and social media. This paper describes recommendations for policy and practice based on an interdisciplinary (ethical, legal, psychosocial and empirical) research. Findings show that no age limits can be adequately justified, including the current ones. Consequently, we recommended modification of the law by dropping age limits and by making donor information accessible upon the birth of a donor-conceived person. Moreover, we set forth recommendations for due diligence in providing donor information. Integrating donor information into one's life's story is a gradual process that should be tailored to a child's development and individual needs. Because this process is more than a single moment of accessing donor information, we see parents as being best suited to align accessing donor information with their child's needs. We recommend that donor-conceived people, parents and donors are given support in this process, provided by professionals with experience and knowledge about donor conception.

使有捐赠孩子的家庭能够定制他们的家庭故事。关于在荷兰获取捐助者信息的法定年龄限制的政策和做法的建议。
2020年,荷兰政府呼吁调查对捐赠者怀孕的人访问捐赠者信息的年龄限制,因为荷兰法律中没有充分的理由限制这种限制。由于使用直接面向消费者的基因检测和社交媒体进行搜索,在不断变化的捐赠者受孕环境中,这个问题同样重要。本文描述了基于跨学科(伦理、法律、社会心理和实证)研究的政策和实践建议。调查结果表明,没有任何年龄限制是合理的,包括目前的年龄限制。因此,我们建议修改法律,取消年龄限制,并在捐赠者怀孕的人出生时提供捐赠者信息。此外,我们还提出了在提供捐助者信息方面进行尽职调查的建议。将捐赠者的信息整合到一个人的生活故事中是一个渐进的过程,应该根据孩子的发展和个人需求进行调整。因为这个过程不仅仅是获取捐赠者信息的一个瞬间,我们认为父母最适合将获取捐赠者信息与孩子的需求结合起来。我们建议,在这一过程中,由具有捐赠受孕经验和知识的专业人员为捐赠孕妇、父母和捐赠者提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Fertility
Human Fertility OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Human Fertility is a leading international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice in the areas of human fertility and infertility. Topics included span the range from molecular medicine to healthcare delivery, and contributions are welcomed from professionals and academics from the spectrum of disciplines concerned with human fertility. It is published on behalf of the British Fertility Society. The journal also provides a forum for the publication of peer-reviewed articles arising out of the activities of the Association of Biomedical Andrologists, the Association of Clinical Embryologists, the Association of Irish Clinical Embryologists, the British Andrology Society, the British Infertility Counselling Association, the Irish Fertility Society and the Royal College of Nursing Fertility Nurses Group. All submissions are welcome. Articles considered include original papers, reviews, policy statements, commentaries, debates, correspondence, and reports of sessions at meetings. The journal also publishes refereed abstracts from the meetings of the constituent organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信