Respiratory effects of electronic cigarette use in individuals who never smoked: A systematic review.

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-23 DOI:10.1016/j.clinme.2025.100295
Grazia Caci, Arielle Selya, Giusy Rita Maria La Rosa, Lucia Spicuzza, Jaymin B Morjaria, Giulio Geraci, Riccardo Polosa
{"title":"Respiratory effects of electronic cigarette use in individuals who never smoked: A systematic review.","authors":"Grazia Caci, Arielle Selya, Giusy Rita Maria La Rosa, Lucia Spicuzza, Jaymin B Morjaria, Giulio Geraci, Riccardo Polosa","doi":"10.1016/j.clinme.2025.100295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current evidence on whether electronic cigarettes (ECs) pose respiratory risks is unclear, due to confounding by cigarette smoking; evidence among never-smoking individuals is needed. Following a narrative review and critical appraisal, a systematic review assessed possible respiratory outcomes prospectively associated with EC use among individuals who never smoked. Bias risk was evaluated using a Joanna Briggs Institute tool. Ten eligible studies examined outcomes of self-reported respiratory diagnosis, symptoms and lung function. Eight examined adults and three examined youth (with overlap). Overall, seven studies showed no significant association between respiratory outcomes and EC use among never-smoking individuals (P>0.05). Evidence for coughing and wheezing symptoms varied by model specification. Overall, EC use by never-smoking individuals is not associated with risk of severe respiratory outcomes, but may be associated with mild coughing/wheezing. Further research is needed using larger samples, long-term follow-ups (>5 years), and information on detailed patterns of EC use.</p>","PeriodicalId":10492,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"100295"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11930579/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinme.2025.100295","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current evidence on whether electronic cigarettes (ECs) pose respiratory risks is unclear, due to confounding by cigarette smoking; evidence among never-smoking individuals is needed. Following a narrative review and critical appraisal, a systematic review assessed possible respiratory outcomes prospectively associated with EC use among individuals who never smoked. Bias risk was evaluated using a Joanna Briggs Institute tool. Ten eligible studies examined outcomes of self-reported respiratory diagnosis, symptoms and lung function. Eight examined adults and three examined youth (with overlap). Overall, seven studies showed no significant association between respiratory outcomes and EC use among never-smoking individuals (P>0.05). Evidence for coughing and wheezing symptoms varied by model specification. Overall, EC use by never-smoking individuals is not associated with risk of severe respiratory outcomes, but may be associated with mild coughing/wheezing. Further research is needed using larger samples, long-term follow-ups (>5 years), and information on detailed patterns of EC use.

从未吸烟者使用电子香烟对呼吸系统的影响:系统综述。
由于吸烟的混杂,目前关于电子烟(ECs)是否会造成呼吸道风险的证据尚不清楚;需要在从不吸烟的人群中提供证据。在叙述性回顾和批判性评价之后,系统回顾评估了从未吸烟的个体中使用EC可能导致的呼吸结果。偏倚风险评估采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的工具。10项符合条件的研究检查了自我报告的呼吸系统诊断、症状和肺功能的结果。8名成人和3名青少年(有重叠)。总体而言,7项研究显示从不吸烟个体的呼吸结果与电子烟使用之间无显著关联(P < 0.05)。咳嗽和喘息症状的证据因型号规格而异。总体而言,从不吸烟的人使用EC与严重呼吸系统疾病的风险无关,但可能与轻度咳嗽/喘息有关。进一步的研究需要使用更大的样本,长期随访(50 - 5年),以及关于EC使用的详细模式的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Medicine
Clinical Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Medicine is aimed at practising physicians in the UK and overseas and has relevance to all those managing or working within the healthcare sector. Available in print and online, the journal seeks to encourage high standards of medical care by promoting good clinical practice through original research, review and comment. The journal also includes a dedicated continuing medical education (CME) section in each issue. This presents the latest advances in a chosen specialty, with self-assessment questions at the end of each topic enabling CPD accreditation to be acquired. ISSN: 1470-2118 E-ISSN: 1473-4893 Frequency: 6 issues per year
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信