Comparison of the perinatal outcomes of live-born singletons between blastocysts and cleavage-stage embryo transfer in FET cycles via propensity score matching.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yaqiong Zeng, Juan Chen, Heying Zhang, Xiaowei Nie, Yong Tan, Yanyun Yin
{"title":"Comparison of the perinatal outcomes of live-born singletons between blastocysts and cleavage-stage embryo transfer in FET cycles via propensity score matching.","authors":"Yaqiong Zeng, Juan Chen, Heying Zhang, Xiaowei Nie, Yong Tan, Yanyun Yin","doi":"10.1186/s12884-025-07347-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In previous studies, the incidences of premature births and large for newborn gestational age (LGA ) infants were higher with blastocyst transfer than with cleavage-stage embryo transfer in infants conceived via frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. However, those previous studies reported unbalanced baseline characteristics between the blastocyst transfer group and the cleavage embryo transfer group. Therefore, in this study, we used propensity score matching to compare the birth weight and newborn gestational age of live-born singletons between blastocyst and cleavage-stage embryo transfer in FET cycles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2018 to April 2023, 706 cases of singleton delivery resulting from FET cycles that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in this study, of which 180 cases resulted from cleavage embryo transfer and 526 cases resulted from blastocyst transfer. Using propensity score matching, we obtained a well-balanced cohort with 173 pairs of cases. We compared the neonatal perinatal outcomes of this cohort, including birth weight and newborn gestational age, which are the primary outcomes. Moreover, we used multivariate linear regression to analyze whether the type of embryo transferred in a FET cycle was correlated with neonatal birth weight or newborn gestational age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in any of the baseline characteristics between the blastocyst transfer group and cleavage-stage embryo transfer group. There were also no differences between the two groups in terms of the mean birth weight (g) (3380 [3050,3665] vs. 3380 [3002.5,3650], p = 0.941), newborn gestational age (days) (275 [269,280] vs. 275 [270,281], p = 0.282) or other perinatal outcomes. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the type of embryo transferred in a FET cycle was not correlated with neonatal birth weight or gestational age.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Blastocyst transfer had perinatal outcomes similar to those of cleavage-stage embryo transfer for live-born singletons in FET cycles and did not influence the mean birth weight or gestational age of the neonates.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9033,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","volume":"25 1","pages":"200"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-025-07347-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In previous studies, the incidences of premature births and large for newborn gestational age (LGA ) infants were higher with blastocyst transfer than with cleavage-stage embryo transfer in infants conceived via frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. However, those previous studies reported unbalanced baseline characteristics between the blastocyst transfer group and the cleavage embryo transfer group. Therefore, in this study, we used propensity score matching to compare the birth weight and newborn gestational age of live-born singletons between blastocyst and cleavage-stage embryo transfer in FET cycles.

Methods: From January 2018 to April 2023, 706 cases of singleton delivery resulting from FET cycles that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in this study, of which 180 cases resulted from cleavage embryo transfer and 526 cases resulted from blastocyst transfer. Using propensity score matching, we obtained a well-balanced cohort with 173 pairs of cases. We compared the neonatal perinatal outcomes of this cohort, including birth weight and newborn gestational age, which are the primary outcomes. Moreover, we used multivariate linear regression to analyze whether the type of embryo transferred in a FET cycle was correlated with neonatal birth weight or newborn gestational age.

Results: After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in any of the baseline characteristics between the blastocyst transfer group and cleavage-stage embryo transfer group. There were also no differences between the two groups in terms of the mean birth weight (g) (3380 [3050,3665] vs. 3380 [3002.5,3650], p = 0.941), newborn gestational age (days) (275 [269,280] vs. 275 [270,281], p = 0.282) or other perinatal outcomes. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the type of embryo transferred in a FET cycle was not correlated with neonatal birth weight or gestational age.

Conclusions: Blastocyst transfer had perinatal outcomes similar to those of cleavage-stage embryo transfer for live-born singletons in FET cycles and did not influence the mean birth weight or gestational age of the neonates.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

通过倾向得分匹配比较 FET 周期中囊胚和裂殖期胚胎移植的活产单胎围产期结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
845
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pregnancy & Childbirth is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of pregnancy and childbirth. The journal welcomes submissions on the biomedical aspects of pregnancy, breastfeeding, labor, maternal health, maternity care, trends and sociological aspects of pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信