The impact of the pore position of a self-coiling catheter for continuous interscalene brachial plexus block on postoperative pain in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery: a prospective observational study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Marie Hara, Yoshihiro Ikuta, Naoyuki Hirata
{"title":"The impact of the pore position of a self-coiling catheter for continuous interscalene brachial plexus block on postoperative pain in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Marie Hara, Yoshihiro Ikuta, Naoyuki Hirata","doi":"10.1007/s00540-025-03465-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This prospective observational study aimed to investigate the usefulness of the self-coiling catheter for continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (CISB) in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). In 22 patients, the self-coiling tip of catheter was placed anterior to the C5 and C6 roots under ultrasound guidance. The primary outcome is the relationship between the distance from the distal side pore of the catheter to the C5/C6 nerve roots and the visual analogue scale (VAS) of postoperative pain. The distance was recorded as a positive value when the distal pore was anterior to the C5/C6 nerve roots, and as a negative value when it was posterior to the roots. The median distance from the distal pore to C5/C6 nerve roots was 5.0 [4.1, 6.5] mm at catheter placement before surgery and 0.0 [- 4.3, 2.2] mm at catheter removal the day after surgery. The distance between the distal pore and the cervical nerve roots was associated with the VAS score at catheter removal (r =- 0.455, P = 0.033). These findings suggest that the distance between the distal pore of the self-coiling catheter and the C5/C6 nerve roots may affect the analgesic effect of CISB after ARCR.</p>","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-025-03465-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This prospective observational study aimed to investigate the usefulness of the self-coiling catheter for continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (CISB) in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). In 22 patients, the self-coiling tip of catheter was placed anterior to the C5 and C6 roots under ultrasound guidance. The primary outcome is the relationship between the distance from the distal side pore of the catheter to the C5/C6 nerve roots and the visual analogue scale (VAS) of postoperative pain. The distance was recorded as a positive value when the distal pore was anterior to the C5/C6 nerve roots, and as a negative value when it was posterior to the roots. The median distance from the distal pore to C5/C6 nerve roots was 5.0 [4.1, 6.5] mm at catheter placement before surgery and 0.0 [- 4.3, 2.2] mm at catheter removal the day after surgery. The distance between the distal pore and the cervical nerve roots was associated with the VAS score at catheter removal (r =- 0.455, P = 0.033). These findings suggest that the distance between the distal pore of the self-coiling catheter and the C5/C6 nerve roots may affect the analgesic effect of CISB after ARCR.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Anesthesia
Journal of Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Anesthesia is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. This journal publishes original articles, review articles, special articles, clinical reports, short communications, letters to the editor, and book and multimedia reviews. The editors welcome the submission of manuscripts devoted to anesthesia and related topics from any country of the world. Membership in the Society is not a prerequisite. The Journal of Anesthesia (JA) welcomes case reports that show unique cases in perioperative medicine, intensive care, emergency medicine, and pain management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信