Docetaxel rechallenge in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a real-world study of previously discontinued patients for non-progression reasons.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Hui-Ai Zeng, Hui-Min Lv, Meng-Wei Zhang, Li-Min Niu, Jing Wang, Hui-Hui Sun, Zhen-Zhen Liu, Min Yan
{"title":"Docetaxel rechallenge in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a real-world study of previously discontinued patients for non-progression reasons.","authors":"Hui-Ai Zeng, Hui-Min Lv, Meng-Wei Zhang, Li-Min Niu, Jing Wang, Hui-Hui Sun, Zhen-Zhen Liu, Min Yan","doi":"10.1007/s00432-025-06133-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel rechallenge in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients who discontinued docetaxel for reasons other than disease progression.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed HER2-negative MBC patients treated with docetaxel-based therapy (DBT) at our institution from 2010 to 2020. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Multivariate Cox regression and propensity score matching analysis (PSMA) were used to minimize bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 600 patients, 369 only received docetaxel once (control group), while 231 (38.5%) received docetaxel rechallenge as second or later-line therapy (rechallenge group). In the second-line rechallenge subset (143 patients), ORR was 51.0%, and PFS was 6.7 months. Multivariate analysis showed that a response to initial DBT (stable disease [SD] vs. complete response/partial response [CR/PR]: odds ratio [OR] 2.615, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.373-4.981; p = 0.03) independently predicted the ORR. Beyond second-line rechallenge, the ORR and PFS were 37.5% and 5.6 months, respectively. After PSMA, the rechallenge group demonstrated significantly improved OS compared to the control group: 50.5 months vs. 46.0 months (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.632; 95% CI 0.455-0.878; p = 0.006). The toxicities reported were manageable, primarily hematologic, with grade 3-4 events occurring in 19.5% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that docetaxel rechallenge may be an effective and tolerable later-line treatment option for patients with HER2-negative MBC, particularly those who responded to initial DBT. However, further prospective, randomized controlled research is needed to fully evaluate its impact on disease response in this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","volume":"151 2","pages":"89"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06133-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel rechallenge in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients who discontinued docetaxel for reasons other than disease progression.

Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed HER2-negative MBC patients treated with docetaxel-based therapy (DBT) at our institution from 2010 to 2020. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Multivariate Cox regression and propensity score matching analysis (PSMA) were used to minimize bias.

Results: Among 600 patients, 369 only received docetaxel once (control group), while 231 (38.5%) received docetaxel rechallenge as second or later-line therapy (rechallenge group). In the second-line rechallenge subset (143 patients), ORR was 51.0%, and PFS was 6.7 months. Multivariate analysis showed that a response to initial DBT (stable disease [SD] vs. complete response/partial response [CR/PR]: odds ratio [OR] 2.615, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.373-4.981; p = 0.03) independently predicted the ORR. Beyond second-line rechallenge, the ORR and PFS were 37.5% and 5.6 months, respectively. After PSMA, the rechallenge group demonstrated significantly improved OS compared to the control group: 50.5 months vs. 46.0 months (Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.632; 95% CI 0.455-0.878; p = 0.006). The toxicities reported were manageable, primarily hematologic, with grade 3-4 events occurring in 19.5% of cases.

Conclusion: This study suggests that docetaxel rechallenge may be an effective and tolerable later-line treatment option for patients with HER2-negative MBC, particularly those who responded to initial DBT. However, further prospective, randomized controlled research is needed to fully evaluate its impact on disease response in this patient population.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
577
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology" publishes significant and up-to-date articles within the fields of experimental and clinical oncology. The journal, which is chiefly devoted to Original papers, also includes Reviews as well as Editorials and Guest editorials on current, controversial topics. The section Letters to the editors provides a forum for a rapid exchange of comments and information concerning previously published papers and topics of current interest. Meeting reports provide current information on the latest results presented at important congresses. The following fields are covered: carcinogenesis - etiology, mechanisms; molecular biology; recent developments in tumor therapy; general diagnosis; laboratory diagnosis; diagnostic and experimental pathology; oncologic surgery; and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信