Machine Learning-Based First-Day Mortality Prediction for Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: The Novel RESCUE-24 Score.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Jung-Chi Hsu, Chen-Hsu Pai, Lian-Yu Lin, Chih-Hsien Wang, Ling-Yi Wei, Jeng-Wei Chen, Nai-Hsin Chi, Shu-Chien Huang, Hsi-Yu Yu, Nai-Kuan Chou, Ron-Bin Hsu, Yih-Sharng Chen
{"title":"Machine Learning-Based First-Day Mortality Prediction for Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: The Novel RESCUE-24 Score.","authors":"Jung-Chi Hsu, Chen-Hsu Pai, Lian-Yu Lin, Chih-Hsien Wang, Ling-Yi Wei, Jeng-Wei Chen, Nai-Hsin Chi, Shu-Chien Huang, Hsi-Yu Yu, Nai-Kuan Chou, Ron-Bin Hsu, Yih-Sharng Chen","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) provides critical cardiac support, but predicting outcomes remains a challenge. We enrolled 1,748 adult venoarterial (VA)-ECMO patients at the National Taiwan University Hospital between 2010 and 2021. The overall mortality rate was 68.2%. Machine learning with the random survival forest (RSF) model demonstrated superior prediction for in-hospital mortality (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.953, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.925-0.981), outperforming the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA; 0.753 [0.689-0.817]), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II (0.737 [0.672-0.802]), Survival after Venoarterial ECMO (SAVE; 0.624 [0.551-0.697]), ENCOURAGE (0.675 [0.606-0.743]), and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) III (0.604 [0.533-0.675]) scores. Failure to achieve 25% clearance at 8 hours and 50% at 16 hours significantly increased mortality risk (HR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.27-2.14, p < 0.001; HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.02-1.54, p = 0.035). Based on the RSF-derived variable importance, the RESCUE-24 Score was developed, assigning points for lactic acid clearance (10 for <50% at 16 hours, 6 for <25% at 8 hours), SvO2 <75% (3 points), oliguria <500 ml (2 points), and age ≥60 years (2 points). Patients were classified into low risk (0-2), medium risk (3-20), and high risk (≥21). The medium- and high-risk groups exhibited significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared with the low-risk group (HR: 1.93 [1.46-2.55] and 5.47 [4.07-7.35], p < 0.002, respectively). Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed that improved lactic acid clearance at 8 and 16 hours was associated with better survival (log-rank p < 0.001). The three groups of the RESCUE-24 Score also showed significant survival differences (log-rank p < 0.001). In conclusion, machine learning can help identify high-risk populations for tailored management. Achieving optimal lactic acid clearance within 24 hours is crucial for improving survival outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002395","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) provides critical cardiac support, but predicting outcomes remains a challenge. We enrolled 1,748 adult venoarterial (VA)-ECMO patients at the National Taiwan University Hospital between 2010 and 2021. The overall mortality rate was 68.2%. Machine learning with the random survival forest (RSF) model demonstrated superior prediction for in-hospital mortality (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.953, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.925-0.981), outperforming the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA; 0.753 [0.689-0.817]), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II (0.737 [0.672-0.802]), Survival after Venoarterial ECMO (SAVE; 0.624 [0.551-0.697]), ENCOURAGE (0.675 [0.606-0.743]), and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) III (0.604 [0.533-0.675]) scores. Failure to achieve 25% clearance at 8 hours and 50% at 16 hours significantly increased mortality risk (HR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.27-2.14, p < 0.001; HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.02-1.54, p = 0.035). Based on the RSF-derived variable importance, the RESCUE-24 Score was developed, assigning points for lactic acid clearance (10 for <50% at 16 hours, 6 for <25% at 8 hours), SvO2 <75% (3 points), oliguria <500 ml (2 points), and age ≥60 years (2 points). Patients were classified into low risk (0-2), medium risk (3-20), and high risk (≥21). The medium- and high-risk groups exhibited significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared with the low-risk group (HR: 1.93 [1.46-2.55] and 5.47 [4.07-7.35], p < 0.002, respectively). Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed that improved lactic acid clearance at 8 and 16 hours was associated with better survival (log-rank p < 0.001). The three groups of the RESCUE-24 Score also showed significant survival differences (log-rank p < 0.001). In conclusion, machine learning can help identify high-risk populations for tailored management. Achieving optimal lactic acid clearance within 24 hours is crucial for improving survival outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信