Shernaz S Dossabhoy, Tara Lahiji-Neary, Jocelyn Morta, Lauran Miklosey, Thelma Flores, Carolyn King, Carlos A Moreno, Rouchelyn Fallorina, Ani Bagdasarian, Shipra Arya, Jordan R Stern, Jason T Lee, Ronald L Dalman
{"title":"Leveraging the Vascular Quality Initiative to Reduce Length of Stay following Elective Carotid Endarterectomy and Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair.","authors":"Shernaz S Dossabhoy, Tara Lahiji-Neary, Jocelyn Morta, Lauran Miklosey, Thelma Flores, Carolyn King, Carlos A Moreno, Rouchelyn Fallorina, Ani Bagdasarian, Shipra Arya, Jordan R Stern, Jason T Lee, Ronald L Dalman","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.01.232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Length of stay (LOS) is a key quality metric for the Society for Vascular Surgery's Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI). In 2021, our hospital was an outlier for 'prolonged LOS' after carotid endarterectomy (CEA >1 day, 67% vs target 21%) and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR >2 days, 36% vs target 22%). In response, we launched a quality improvement (QI) initiative to reduce LOS following elective CEA and EVAR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We completed a retrospective review of all CEA and EVAR cases (1/2021 to 3/2022) using data obtained from VQI. During the intervention phase (4/2022 to 7/2023), a multidisciplinary team defined the problem state, refined workflows, used Plan-Do-Study-Act method to address key drivers, and maintained a prospective database of patients and LOS outcomes. Preoperative interventions educated patient stakeholders (e.g., nurses, case managers, trainees) on LOS benchmarks, communicated expected discharge date and time to patients/families, and screened all patients for high-risk discharge, leading to prolonged LOS. After surgery, recovery protocols were standardized, including Foley catheter removal midnight POD0 and physical therapy evaluation morning POD1. Primary outcomes, rates of prolonged LOS and mean LOS (days, hours), and secondary outcomes (discharge within 1 day, readmission, mortality) were compared pre and post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 120 patients were included (48 CEA, 72 EVAR) with 52 (22 CEA, 31 EVAR) pre-intervention and 67 (26 CEA, 41 EVAR) post-intervention. Over the intervention, rate of prolonged LOS significantly decreased from 50% to 15% for CEA (P=.01) and 26% to 7% for EVAR (P=.03). While mean LOS decreased for CEA from 2.2 ± 3.1 days to 1.2 ± 0.5 days (52.7 ± 75.7 hours to 27.7 ± 12.0 hours) and for EVAR from 2.3 ± 1.8 days to 1.5 ± 1.5 days (55.1 ± 43.2 hours to 36.9 ± 35.5 hours). Patients discharged within 1 day from surgery significantly increased from 50% to 85% for CEA and 45% to 76% for EVAR (both P=.01). Balancing measures of 30-day readmission and mortality did not significantly increase following our intervention with three readmissions overall and no deaths in either cohort. Our Fall 2023 VQI Regional Report confirmed these findings with reduced LOS for CEA and EVAR below regional and national targets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>VQI benchmarking identifies system-wide, surgeon-specific QI opportunities. Through engaging multidisciplinary teams and implementing patient-centric interventions across the care continuum, we successfully reduced LOS for CEA and EVAR below VQI targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.01.232","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Length of stay (LOS) is a key quality metric for the Society for Vascular Surgery's Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI). In 2021, our hospital was an outlier for 'prolonged LOS' after carotid endarterectomy (CEA >1 day, 67% vs target 21%) and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR >2 days, 36% vs target 22%). In response, we launched a quality improvement (QI) initiative to reduce LOS following elective CEA and EVAR.
Methods: We completed a retrospective review of all CEA and EVAR cases (1/2021 to 3/2022) using data obtained from VQI. During the intervention phase (4/2022 to 7/2023), a multidisciplinary team defined the problem state, refined workflows, used Plan-Do-Study-Act method to address key drivers, and maintained a prospective database of patients and LOS outcomes. Preoperative interventions educated patient stakeholders (e.g., nurses, case managers, trainees) on LOS benchmarks, communicated expected discharge date and time to patients/families, and screened all patients for high-risk discharge, leading to prolonged LOS. After surgery, recovery protocols were standardized, including Foley catheter removal midnight POD0 and physical therapy evaluation morning POD1. Primary outcomes, rates of prolonged LOS and mean LOS (days, hours), and secondary outcomes (discharge within 1 day, readmission, mortality) were compared pre and post-intervention.
Results: Overall, 120 patients were included (48 CEA, 72 EVAR) with 52 (22 CEA, 31 EVAR) pre-intervention and 67 (26 CEA, 41 EVAR) post-intervention. Over the intervention, rate of prolonged LOS significantly decreased from 50% to 15% for CEA (P=.01) and 26% to 7% for EVAR (P=.03). While mean LOS decreased for CEA from 2.2 ± 3.1 days to 1.2 ± 0.5 days (52.7 ± 75.7 hours to 27.7 ± 12.0 hours) and for EVAR from 2.3 ± 1.8 days to 1.5 ± 1.5 days (55.1 ± 43.2 hours to 36.9 ± 35.5 hours). Patients discharged within 1 day from surgery significantly increased from 50% to 85% for CEA and 45% to 76% for EVAR (both P=.01). Balancing measures of 30-day readmission and mortality did not significantly increase following our intervention with three readmissions overall and no deaths in either cohort. Our Fall 2023 VQI Regional Report confirmed these findings with reduced LOS for CEA and EVAR below regional and national targets.
Conclusions: VQI benchmarking identifies system-wide, surgeon-specific QI opportunities. Through engaging multidisciplinary teams and implementing patient-centric interventions across the care continuum, we successfully reduced LOS for CEA and EVAR below VQI targets.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.