Comparison of chemical composition, nematicidal activity and acetylcholinesterase inhibition with in silico mechanistic insights of Hedychium flavescens essential oils and extracts from aerial parts and rhizomes

IF 1.4 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Himani Karakoti , Pooja Bargali , Ravendra Kumar , Om Prakash , Satya Kumar , Stefania Garzoli , Dharmendra Singh Rawat , Jolanta Maslowiecka , Valery A. Isidorov
{"title":"Comparison of chemical composition, nematicidal activity and acetylcholinesterase inhibition with in silico mechanistic insights of Hedychium flavescens essential oils and extracts from aerial parts and rhizomes","authors":"Himani Karakoti ,&nbsp;Pooja Bargali ,&nbsp;Ravendra Kumar ,&nbsp;Om Prakash ,&nbsp;Satya Kumar ,&nbsp;Stefania Garzoli ,&nbsp;Dharmendra Singh Rawat ,&nbsp;Jolanta Maslowiecka ,&nbsp;Valery A. Isidorov","doi":"10.1016/j.bse.2025.104987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Hedychium flavescens</em> is recognized for its medicinal and pesticidal potential, yet its comprehensive phytochemical profile and bioactivity against nematodes remain underexplored. This study offers a comparative analysis of the chemical composition, nematicidal activity and acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition of essential oils (EOs) and extracts from the plant's aerial and rhizome parts. GC-MS analysis identified significant chemical variation between the parts, with monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes predominating in both EOs. The major compounds were <em>α</em>-pinene, <em>β</em>-pinene, 1,8-cineole, linalool, and <em>E-</em>caryophyllene. On the other side, the extracts were dominated by fatty acids, sterols, and diterpenoids. Nematicidal activity was evaluated against <em>Meloidogyne incognita</em>, with rhizome EO showing higher potency (76% mortality at 1 μL/mL). Aerial and rhizome EOs exhibited significant nematode egg hatching inhibition, with 77.59–89.66% inhibition at 1000 μg/mL after 96 h of exposure. <em>In-vitro</em> AChE inhibition assays demonstrated potential neuroprotective properties in terms of IC<sub>50</sub> values with rhizome EO showing best inhibition activity (IC<sub>50</sub> = 181.03 μg/mL). Additionally, <em>in silico</em> docking studies provided insights into the mechanism of action of key compounds on AChE. The findings support <em>H. flavescens</em> as a natural alternative to synthetic nematicides and AChE inhibitors. Further studies are needed to explore its broader applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8799,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 104987"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305197825000365","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hedychium flavescens is recognized for its medicinal and pesticidal potential, yet its comprehensive phytochemical profile and bioactivity against nematodes remain underexplored. This study offers a comparative analysis of the chemical composition, nematicidal activity and acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibition of essential oils (EOs) and extracts from the plant's aerial and rhizome parts. GC-MS analysis identified significant chemical variation between the parts, with monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes predominating in both EOs. The major compounds were α-pinene, β-pinene, 1,8-cineole, linalool, and E-caryophyllene. On the other side, the extracts were dominated by fatty acids, sterols, and diterpenoids. Nematicidal activity was evaluated against Meloidogyne incognita, with rhizome EO showing higher potency (76% mortality at 1 μL/mL). Aerial and rhizome EOs exhibited significant nematode egg hatching inhibition, with 77.59–89.66% inhibition at 1000 μg/mL after 96 h of exposure. In-vitro AChE inhibition assays demonstrated potential neuroprotective properties in terms of IC50 values with rhizome EO showing best inhibition activity (IC50 = 181.03 μg/mL). Additionally, in silico docking studies provided insights into the mechanism of action of key compounds on AChE. The findings support H. flavescens as a natural alternative to synthetic nematicides and AChE inhibitors. Further studies are needed to explore its broader applications.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biochemical Systematics and Ecology
Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Biochemical Systematics and Ecology is devoted to the publication of original papers and reviews, both submitted and invited, in two subject areas: I) the application of biochemistry to problems relating to systematic biology of organisms (biochemical systematics); II) the role of biochemistry in interactions between organisms or between an organism and its environment (biochemical ecology). In the Biochemical Systematics subject area, comparative studies of the distribution of (secondary) metabolites within a wider taxon (e.g. genus or family) are welcome. Comparative studies, encompassing multiple accessions of each of the taxa within their distribution are particularly encouraged. Welcome are also studies combining classical chemosystematic studies (such as comparative HPLC-MS or GC-MS investigations) with (macro-) molecular phylogenetic studies. Studies that involve the comparative use of compounds to help differentiate among species such as adulterants or substitutes that illustrate the applied use of chemosystematics are welcome. In contrast, studies solely employing macromolecular phylogenetic techniques (gene sequences, RAPD studies etc.) will be considered out of scope. Discouraged are manuscripts that report known or new compounds from a single source taxon without addressing a systematic hypothesis. Also considered out of scope are studies using outdated and hard to reproduce macromolecular techniques such as RAPDs in combination with standard chemosystematic techniques such as GC-FID and GC-MS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信