{"title":"Performance of inflationary oscillometric blood pressure measurement in the presence of atrial fibrillation: comparison to sinus rhythm.","authors":"Yuichi Maki, Yasumasa Sakamoto, Risa Abe, Kohei Morozumi, Daisuke Toyoda, Yoshifumi Kotake","doi":"10.1007/s00540-025-03462-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the success rate, measurement duration and the accuracy of inflationary non-invasive blood pressure (iNIBP, Nihon Koden Corp, Tokyo, Japan) during general anesthesia between the subjects with sinus rhythm (SR) and atrial fibrillation (AF) against invasive arterial pressure (IAP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>iNIBP was determined every 5 min and IAP was continuously monitored in 30 subjects with sinus rhythm and 30 subjects with atrial fibrillation. The outcomes of this study were the success rate, the measurement duration of iNIBP and the accuracy of iNIBP in reference to IAP and 5 pair of data from each subject. The accuracy was assessed with concordance correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The success rate of iNIBP was 45% and 59% (p < 0.01) with AF and SR, respectively. Measurement duration of iNIBP was not different between AF and SR group. The Lin concordance correlation coefficient of mean blood pressure of iNIBP against IAP of SR group and AF group was 0.83 and 0.77, respectively. The mean bias (SD) of mean blood pressure of iNIBP against IAP of SR group and AF group was 5.8 (8.9) mmHg and 7.1 (11.5) mmHg, respectively. The precision was significantly wider in AF group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Presence of AF decreased the incidence of successful determination of blood pressure during cuff inflation. The accuracy of mean blood pressure determination was not considerably affected except for the wider limits of agreement.</p>","PeriodicalId":14997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-025-03462-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the success rate, measurement duration and the accuracy of inflationary non-invasive blood pressure (iNIBP, Nihon Koden Corp, Tokyo, Japan) during general anesthesia between the subjects with sinus rhythm (SR) and atrial fibrillation (AF) against invasive arterial pressure (IAP).
Methods: iNIBP was determined every 5 min and IAP was continuously monitored in 30 subjects with sinus rhythm and 30 subjects with atrial fibrillation. The outcomes of this study were the success rate, the measurement duration of iNIBP and the accuracy of iNIBP in reference to IAP and 5 pair of data from each subject. The accuracy was assessed with concordance correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman method.
Results: The success rate of iNIBP was 45% and 59% (p < 0.01) with AF and SR, respectively. Measurement duration of iNIBP was not different between AF and SR group. The Lin concordance correlation coefficient of mean blood pressure of iNIBP against IAP of SR group and AF group was 0.83 and 0.77, respectively. The mean bias (SD) of mean blood pressure of iNIBP against IAP of SR group and AF group was 5.8 (8.9) mmHg and 7.1 (11.5) mmHg, respectively. The precision was significantly wider in AF group.
Conclusion: Presence of AF decreased the incidence of successful determination of blood pressure during cuff inflation. The accuracy of mean blood pressure determination was not considerably affected except for the wider limits of agreement.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Anesthesia is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists. This journal publishes original articles, review articles, special articles, clinical reports, short communications, letters to the editor, and book and multimedia reviews. The editors welcome the submission of manuscripts devoted to anesthesia and related topics from any country of the world. Membership in the Society is not a prerequisite.
The Journal of Anesthesia (JA) welcomes case reports that show unique cases in perioperative medicine, intensive care, emergency medicine, and pain management.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
