Learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection in early gastric neoplasm using a multibending endoscope.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2025-02-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848251318861
Gil Ho Lee, Eunyoung Lee, Sun Gyo Lim, Bumhee Park, Sung Jae Shin, Kee Myung Lee, Choong-Kyun Noh
{"title":"Learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection in early gastric neoplasm using a multibending endoscope.","authors":"Gil Ho Lee, Eunyoung Lee, Sun Gyo Lim, Bumhee Park, Sung Jae Shin, Kee Myung Lee, Choong-Kyun Noh","doi":"10.1177/17562848251318861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a representative treatment modality for early gastric neoplasms. However, the learning curve for beginners performing ESD using a multibending endoscope has not been introduced.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the learning curves of operators undergoing intensive training using a multibending endoscope.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was a retrospective single center study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data of over 1500 consecutive gastric ESDs performed by two operators using a multibending endoscope. A change-point analysis with 50 cases of moving average speeds was used to determine the new target resection speed. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to identify the cases required for proficiency in ESD. Risk-adjusted CUSUM (RA-CUSUM) analysis was performed for each operator after adjusting for confounding factors influencing the resection speed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 1491 cases were enrolled, with early gastric cancer accounting for 43.2% (<i>n</i> = 644). Overall, the en bloc resection, R0 resection, and curability rates were 97.7%, 96.0%, and 92.3%, respectively. The mean resection speed was 19.8 cm<sup>2</sup>/h. Because both operators surpassed the commonly used benchmark resection speed of 9 cm<sup>2</sup>/h in the first 50-case block, we established a new target benchmark of 17.9 cm<sup>2</sup>/h in the change-point analysis. CUSUM analysis indicated that performing 166 cases overall was required to achieve the benchmark, with the 2 operators needing 153 and 69 cases to meet this target speed after RA-CUSUM analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a multibending endoscope for gastric ESD can help beginners achieve safe and excellent outcomes. These findings will serve as a useful guide for beginners attempting to use a multibending endoscope.</p>","PeriodicalId":48770,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":"18 ","pages":"17562848251318861"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11831642/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848251318861","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a representative treatment modality for early gastric neoplasms. However, the learning curve for beginners performing ESD using a multibending endoscope has not been introduced.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the learning curves of operators undergoing intensive training using a multibending endoscope.

Design: This was a retrospective single center study.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of over 1500 consecutive gastric ESDs performed by two operators using a multibending endoscope. A change-point analysis with 50 cases of moving average speeds was used to determine the new target resection speed. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to identify the cases required for proficiency in ESD. Risk-adjusted CUSUM (RA-CUSUM) analysis was performed for each operator after adjusting for confounding factors influencing the resection speed.

Results: In total, 1491 cases were enrolled, with early gastric cancer accounting for 43.2% (n = 644). Overall, the en bloc resection, R0 resection, and curability rates were 97.7%, 96.0%, and 92.3%, respectively. The mean resection speed was 19.8 cm2/h. Because both operators surpassed the commonly used benchmark resection speed of 9 cm2/h in the first 50-case block, we established a new target benchmark of 17.9 cm2/h in the change-point analysis. CUSUM analysis indicated that performing 166 cases overall was required to achieve the benchmark, with the 2 operators needing 153 and 69 cases to meet this target speed after RA-CUSUM analysis.

Conclusion: Using a multibending endoscope for gastric ESD can help beginners achieve safe and excellent outcomes. These findings will serve as a useful guide for beginners attempting to use a multibending endoscope.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.40%
发文量
103
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area. The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信