Direct-to-Consumer Testing: Benefits and Concerns of Commercially Accessed Laboratory Tests.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Matthias Orth, Sverre Sandberg, Patti Shih
{"title":"Direct-to-Consumer Testing: Benefits and Concerns of Commercially Accessed Laboratory Tests.","authors":"Matthias Orth, Sverre Sandberg, Patti Shih","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Promoting self-empowerment of patients and of healthy persons in contemporary health cultures shifts the imperative for initiating laboratory tests from the healthcare professionals (HCP) to the patients themselves.</p><p><strong>Content: </strong>Laboratory testing requested directly by patients without interaction by HCP is called DTCT (direct-to-consumer testing). DTCT is not conducted within traditional healthcare systems, and the regulations that protect the patients in healthcare are not necessarily present in DTCT. Aggressive marketing of DTCT may mislead the consumer, resulting in psychological, physical, and financial harm. The benefit of laboratory testing is dependent on being used on selected persons, with samples collected and stored appropriately, measured with an adequate technique and the test results interpreted properly. DTCT can empower patients, but consumer knowledge varies and currently, there is a lack of reliable resources for consumers to consult. In the absence of healthcare protection rules for DTCT, the concept of informing consumers concurrently with marketing DTCT by the vendors is not in place.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>DTCT might be advantageous over traditional testing settings in a few selected situations but has a substantial risk of medicalization of healthy persons and damaging the trust in the reliability of healthcare laboratory testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Promoting self-empowerment of patients and of healthy persons in contemporary health cultures shifts the imperative for initiating laboratory tests from the healthcare professionals (HCP) to the patients themselves.

Content: Laboratory testing requested directly by patients without interaction by HCP is called DTCT (direct-to-consumer testing). DTCT is not conducted within traditional healthcare systems, and the regulations that protect the patients in healthcare are not necessarily present in DTCT. Aggressive marketing of DTCT may mislead the consumer, resulting in psychological, physical, and financial harm. The benefit of laboratory testing is dependent on being used on selected persons, with samples collected and stored appropriately, measured with an adequate technique and the test results interpreted properly. DTCT can empower patients, but consumer knowledge varies and currently, there is a lack of reliable resources for consumers to consult. In the absence of healthcare protection rules for DTCT, the concept of informing consumers concurrently with marketing DTCT by the vendors is not in place.

Summary: DTCT might be advantageous over traditional testing settings in a few selected situations but has a substantial risk of medicalization of healthy persons and damaging the trust in the reliability of healthcare laboratory testing.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry
Clinical chemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM). The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics. In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology. The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信