Color adjustment of single-shade composites following staining, repolishing, and bleaching procedures.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Hasan Can Şahin, Bora Korkut
{"title":"Color adjustment of single-shade composites following staining, repolishing, and bleaching procedures.","authors":"Hasan Can Şahin, Bora Korkut","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-05653-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This in vitro study aimed to assess the color adjustment level of single-shade composites following staining/repolishing and bleaching procedures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Cervical cavities in two depths (1 mm and 2 mm) were restored. Three single-shade composites (Omnichroma, OM; Essentia Universal, EU; and Charisma DiamondOne, CDO) and one group-shade composite (NeoSpectraST, NEO) were used (n = 10 for each). Following the thermal aging, half of the restorations were subjected to staining and repolishing procedures, while the other half were subjected to bleaching procedures. The color adjustments between restoration and adjacent tooth surfaces were assessed. The deemed significance was set at < 0.050.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the initial measurements, the NEO composite presented the lowest ∆E<sub>00</sub> while the OM presented the highest (P = .005 and P = .014). Single-shade composites presented similar and clinically acceptable ∆E<sub>00</sub> values (P ≥ .050; AT ≤ 1.8). After the staining, the ∆E<sub>00</sub> of the OM was higher among the other single-shade composites (P = .001). Repolishing procedure decreased only the ∆E<sub>00</sub> of the NEO composite (P = .020). The bleaching procedure provided no difference for the single-shade composites (P ≥ .050). The increase in the cavity depth decreased the initial color adjustments for the OM in both repolishing and bleaching groups (P = .041 and P = .047).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Re-polishing after aging and staining may not enhance the single-shade composites' color adjustment level, unlike the group-shade composites. Good color adjustment might be predicted for the single-shade composites after bleaching, unlike the group-shade composites. The effect of the cavity depth was considered composite brand dependent.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Clinicians should understand the color adjustment behaviors of the single-shade composites well after different clinical procedures such as staining, re-polishing, and bleaching to perform a proper restorative treatment plan and to obtain better esthetic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"248"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-05653-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This in vitro study aimed to assess the color adjustment level of single-shade composites following staining/repolishing and bleaching procedures.

Materials and methods: Cervical cavities in two depths (1 mm and 2 mm) were restored. Three single-shade composites (Omnichroma, OM; Essentia Universal, EU; and Charisma DiamondOne, CDO) and one group-shade composite (NeoSpectraST, NEO) were used (n = 10 for each). Following the thermal aging, half of the restorations were subjected to staining and repolishing procedures, while the other half were subjected to bleaching procedures. The color adjustments between restoration and adjacent tooth surfaces were assessed. The deemed significance was set at < 0.050.

Results: According to the initial measurements, the NEO composite presented the lowest ∆E00 while the OM presented the highest (P = .005 and P = .014). Single-shade composites presented similar and clinically acceptable ∆E00 values (P ≥ .050; AT ≤ 1.8). After the staining, the ∆E00 of the OM was higher among the other single-shade composites (P = .001). Repolishing procedure decreased only the ∆E00 of the NEO composite (P = .020). The bleaching procedure provided no difference for the single-shade composites (P ≥ .050). The increase in the cavity depth decreased the initial color adjustments for the OM in both repolishing and bleaching groups (P = .041 and P = .047).

Conclusions: Re-polishing after aging and staining may not enhance the single-shade composites' color adjustment level, unlike the group-shade composites. Good color adjustment might be predicted for the single-shade composites after bleaching, unlike the group-shade composites. The effect of the cavity depth was considered composite brand dependent.

Clinical significance: Clinicians should understand the color adjustment behaviors of the single-shade composites well after different clinical procedures such as staining, re-polishing, and bleaching to perform a proper restorative treatment plan and to obtain better esthetic outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信