Phosphorus fertilizer responsive bacteria and fungi in canola (Brassica napus L.) roots are correlated with plant performance

IF 3.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Mengying Liu, S. Patrick Mooleki, Yunliang Li, Dave Schneider, Leon V. Kochian, Bobbi L. Helgason
{"title":"Phosphorus fertilizer responsive bacteria and fungi in canola (Brassica napus L.) roots are correlated with plant performance","authors":"Mengying Liu, S. Patrick Mooleki, Yunliang Li, Dave Schneider, Leon V. Kochian, Bobbi L. Helgason","doi":"10.1007/s11104-025-07286-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Canola (<i>Brassica napus</i> L.) has high phosphorus demand, but its seedlings are sensitive to seed-placed phosphorus fertilizers. Optimizing phosphorus fertilizer management for canola is critical and can benefit from insights into the root-associated microbiota, which enhances phosphorus availability through mineralization and solubilization.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We conducted a two-year field experiment applying monoammonium phosphate fertilizer at three rates (no addition, recommended rate, and high rate at 0, 17, and 32 kg P ha<sup>−1</sup> year<sup>−1</sup>) using two opener placements (narrow at 2.5 cm vs. wide at 10 cm). Canola performance was evaluated, and rhizosphere and root bacterial and fungal microbiota was profiled by DNA amplicon sequencing.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>High-rate and near-seed placement of phosphorus (32 kg P ha<sup>−1</sup> in the 2.5 cm opener) reduced canola seedling emergence but not biomass or yield, which were higher in 2020 than in 2019. Yearly variations and plant growth stages impacted the rhizosphere and root microbiota, while phosphorus fertilization only affected the root microbiota. Phosphorus fertilization enriched <i>Burkholderia-Caballeronia-Paraburkholderia</i>, <i>Luteibacter</i>, <i>Amaurodon</i>, <i>Trichoderma</i>, and <i>Penicillium</i> in roots, Conversely, <i>Chryseobacterium</i>, <i>Chitinophaga</i>, <i>Flavobacterium</i> and <i>Olpidium</i> were more prevalent in roots without phosphorus addition. Yield positively correlated with the relative abundance of <i>Burkholderia-Caballeronia-Paraburkholderia</i> and <i>Trichoderma</i> in roots.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Phosphate fertilizer rates and placements affected canola germination but not yield. Profiling of phosphorus-responsive root microbes suggests that phosphate fertilizer rate and placement at seeding can have a lasting impact on the canola root microbiota as the plant matures, modulating plant growth responses to soil phosphorus availability.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-025-07286-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Canola (Brassica napus L.) has high phosphorus demand, but its seedlings are sensitive to seed-placed phosphorus fertilizers. Optimizing phosphorus fertilizer management for canola is critical and can benefit from insights into the root-associated microbiota, which enhances phosphorus availability through mineralization and solubilization.

Methods

We conducted a two-year field experiment applying monoammonium phosphate fertilizer at three rates (no addition, recommended rate, and high rate at 0, 17, and 32 kg P ha−1 year−1) using two opener placements (narrow at 2.5 cm vs. wide at 10 cm). Canola performance was evaluated, and rhizosphere and root bacterial and fungal microbiota was profiled by DNA amplicon sequencing.

Results

High-rate and near-seed placement of phosphorus (32 kg P ha−1 in the 2.5 cm opener) reduced canola seedling emergence but not biomass or yield, which were higher in 2020 than in 2019. Yearly variations and plant growth stages impacted the rhizosphere and root microbiota, while phosphorus fertilization only affected the root microbiota. Phosphorus fertilization enriched Burkholderia-Caballeronia-Paraburkholderia, Luteibacter, Amaurodon, Trichoderma, and Penicillium in roots, Conversely, Chryseobacterium, Chitinophaga, Flavobacterium and Olpidium were more prevalent in roots without phosphorus addition. Yield positively correlated with the relative abundance of Burkholderia-Caballeronia-Paraburkholderia and Trichoderma in roots.

Conclusions

Phosphate fertilizer rates and placements affected canola germination but not yield. Profiling of phosphorus-responsive root microbes suggests that phosphate fertilizer rate and placement at seeding can have a lasting impact on the canola root microbiota as the plant matures, modulating plant growth responses to soil phosphorus availability.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant and Soil
Plant and Soil 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信