Creating and Publishing Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Scoping Reviews: A 10-step Guide for Students and Trainees

IF 3.8 2区医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING

Academic Radiology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2025.01.020

Ishwarya Sivakumar BS , Katie Lobner MLIS , Rachel L. Walden MS , Clifford R. Weiss MD, FSIR, FCIRSE

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article serves as a step-by-step guide for students and trainees who wish to conduct a systematic review, meta-analysis, or scoping review. As the field of evidence synthesis progresses, more students and trainees are attempting to conduct reviews, and it can be unclear how to approach such a project. In 10 organized steps, we describe different types of reviews, explain how to choose the most appropriate one, detail the steps involved in conducting a review, and list resources that are available to support authors of reviews. We describe the steps involved in 1) forming an appropriate research team; 2) developing a compelling research question; 3) writing a review; and 4) reporting the findings with clarity.

查看原文本刊更多论文

创建和发布系统评论，元分析和范围审查：学生和学员的10步指南。

本文为希望进行系统审查、元分析或范围审查的学生和受训者提供一步一步的指导。随着证据综合领域的发展，越来越多的学生和受训者正在尝试进行审查，但如何处理这样的项目可能并不清楚。在10个有组织的步骤中，我们描述了不同类型的审查，解释了如何选择最合适的审查，详细介绍了进行审查所涉及的步骤，并列出了可用于支持审查作者的资源。我们描述了以下步骤：1)组建一个合适的研究团队；2)开发一个引人注目的研究问题；3)写评论；4)清晰地报告研究结果。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Academic Radiology 医学-核医学

CiteScore

7.60

自引率

10.40%

发文量

432

审稿时长

18 days

期刊介绍： Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.