Assessing the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of dengue in Thailand: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Julia Crowley, Bowen Liu, Hanan Jan
{"title":"Assessing the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of dengue in Thailand: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Julia Crowley, Bowen Liu, Hanan Jan","doi":"10.1186/s13690-025-01522-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Dengue cases are on the rise in Thailand, coinciding with increases in flooding events. Studies pertaining to public knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of dengue prevention have frequently been used to better understand the public's needs towards dengue. While these studies were conducted in different settings, it is necessary to initiate a systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies.</p><p><strong>Subjects and method: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of prior studies in Thailand that assessed the KAP towards dengue. Eligibility criteria were established and independently used by reviewers to select nine studies for the systematic review and three for the meta-analysis. Collectively, the nine studies included 3,058 individuals and 2,519 households.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall estimate of the proportion of participants with good knowledge of dengue prevention is 35% (95% CI: 14-59%), suggesting the majority of the population in Thailand had low levels of knowledge towards dengue. The poor levels of practice in Thailand were also observed and confirmed for the majority of the population by meta-analysis, with the pooled estimate of the proportion of participants with good practice of dengue prevention being 25% (95% CI: 22-27%). In contrast, most of the studies included in the systematic review reported positive attitudes towards dengue prevention, and this finding was also affirmed by the meta-analysis, as the pooled estimate of the proportion of positive attitudes towards dengue prevention is 61% (95% CI: 43-77%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite good attitudes towards dengue prevention, poor knowledge and poor practices predominate, highlighting the need for enhanced public health campaigns to educate the public on dengue risks and prevention methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"83 1","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11827231/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01522-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Dengue cases are on the rise in Thailand, coinciding with increases in flooding events. Studies pertaining to public knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of dengue prevention have frequently been used to better understand the public's needs towards dengue. While these studies were conducted in different settings, it is necessary to initiate a systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies.

Subjects and method: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of prior studies in Thailand that assessed the KAP towards dengue. Eligibility criteria were established and independently used by reviewers to select nine studies for the systematic review and three for the meta-analysis. Collectively, the nine studies included 3,058 individuals and 2,519 households.

Results: The overall estimate of the proportion of participants with good knowledge of dengue prevention is 35% (95% CI: 14-59%), suggesting the majority of the population in Thailand had low levels of knowledge towards dengue. The poor levels of practice in Thailand were also observed and confirmed for the majority of the population by meta-analysis, with the pooled estimate of the proportion of participants with good practice of dengue prevention being 25% (95% CI: 22-27%). In contrast, most of the studies included in the systematic review reported positive attitudes towards dengue prevention, and this finding was also affirmed by the meta-analysis, as the pooled estimate of the proportion of positive attitudes towards dengue prevention is 61% (95% CI: 43-77%).

Conclusion: Despite good attitudes towards dengue prevention, poor knowledge and poor practices predominate, highlighting the need for enhanced public health campaigns to educate the public on dengue risks and prevention methods.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Public Health
Archives of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信