A prospective, single-blinded, non-inferiority, randomized controlled study comparing the effectiveness and safety of oral lactulose combined with carbohydrate-containing clear liquids versus 3-L polyethylene glycol electrolyte for colonoscopy bowel preparation.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Chen Huang, Hongli Liu, Jing Luo, Zhe Xu, Jibin Li, Xu Tian
{"title":"A prospective, single-blinded, non-inferiority, randomized controlled study comparing the effectiveness and safety of oral lactulose combined with carbohydrate-containing clear liquids versus 3-L polyethylene glycol electrolyte for colonoscopy bowel preparation.","authors":"Chen Huang, Hongli Liu, Jing Luo, Zhe Xu, Jibin Li, Xu Tian","doi":"10.1186/s40001-025-02365-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution (PEG-ELS) is the standard for bowel preparation but often suffers from poor patient compliance and tolerability due to its high-volume requirement. This prospective, single-blinded, non-inferiority, randomized control trial aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of a lactulose-based regimen as an alternative for bowel preparation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred nine patients were randomly allocated to receive either a combination regimen consisting of 133.4 g lactulose in 200 mL, 800 mL carbohydrate-containing clear liquid, 2L additional water, and 5 g simethicone (n = 104) or 3L PEG-ELS with 5 g simethicone (n = 105), both administered in a split-dose format. The primary outcome was the rate of adequate bowel preparation, measured by the Boston bowel preparation score (BBPS). Adequate bowel preparation was defined as a BBPS score of 2 or 3 in all colon segments. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of high-quality bowel preparation (defining as a total BBPS score of 8 or 9), polyp detection rate (defining as the percentage of procedures where at least one polyp was detected), willingness to repeat the bowel preparation, adverse events, and changes in blood glucose and electrolyte levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of adequate bowel preparation (96.2% vs. 97.1%, p = 0.691), the percentage of high-quality preparation (62.5% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.529), average total BBPS scores (p = 0.607), polyp detection rates (66.3% vs. 77.1%, p = 0.083), and tolerability and acceptability outcomes, including satisfaction (p = 0.729) and willingness to repeat preparation (p = 0.744), were not statistically different between the two arms. Adverse events and changes in blood glucose and electrolytes showed no significant differences (all p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of oral lactulose and carbohydrate-containing clear fluids was non-inferior to 3L PEG-ELS for bowel preparation adequacy and polyp detection, without statistically significant differences in terms of tolerability and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":11949,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Medical Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11829565/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02365-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution (PEG-ELS) is the standard for bowel preparation but often suffers from poor patient compliance and tolerability due to its high-volume requirement. This prospective, single-blinded, non-inferiority, randomized control trial aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of a lactulose-based regimen as an alternative for bowel preparation.

Methods: Two hundred nine patients were randomly allocated to receive either a combination regimen consisting of 133.4 g lactulose in 200 mL, 800 mL carbohydrate-containing clear liquid, 2L additional water, and 5 g simethicone (n = 104) or 3L PEG-ELS with 5 g simethicone (n = 105), both administered in a split-dose format. The primary outcome was the rate of adequate bowel preparation, measured by the Boston bowel preparation score (BBPS). Adequate bowel preparation was defined as a BBPS score of 2 or 3 in all colon segments. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of high-quality bowel preparation (defining as a total BBPS score of 8 or 9), polyp detection rate (defining as the percentage of procedures where at least one polyp was detected), willingness to repeat the bowel preparation, adverse events, and changes in blood glucose and electrolyte levels.

Results: The rate of adequate bowel preparation (96.2% vs. 97.1%, p = 0.691), the percentage of high-quality preparation (62.5% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.529), average total BBPS scores (p = 0.607), polyp detection rates (66.3% vs. 77.1%, p = 0.083), and tolerability and acceptability outcomes, including satisfaction (p = 0.729) and willingness to repeat preparation (p = 0.744), were not statistically different between the two arms. Adverse events and changes in blood glucose and electrolytes showed no significant differences (all p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The combination of oral lactulose and carbohydrate-containing clear fluids was non-inferior to 3L PEG-ELS for bowel preparation adequacy and polyp detection, without statistically significant differences in terms of tolerability and safety.

背景:聚乙二醇电解质溶液(PEG-ELS)是肠道准备的标准药物,但由于需要大量用药,患者的依从性和耐受性往往较差。这项前瞻性、单盲、非劣效随机对照试验旨在研究以乳果糖为基础的方案作为肠道准备替代方案的有效性和安全性:试验随机分配了 29 名患者,分别接受由 133.4 克乳果糖溶于 200 毫升、800 毫升含碳水化合物的透明液体、2 升附加水和 5 克西甲硅油组成的组合方案(104 人),或 3 升 PEG-ELS 加 5 克西甲硅油组成的组合方案(105 人),两种方案均以分剂量形式给药。主要结果是充分肠道准备率,以波士顿肠道准备评分(BBPS)衡量。所有结肠段的 BBPS 评分达到 2 分或 3 分即为肠道准备充分。次要结果包括高质量肠道准备的百分比(定义为 BBPS 总分 8 分或 9 分)、息肉检出率(定义为至少检出一个息肉的手术百分比)、重复肠道准备的意愿、不良事件以及血糖和电解质水平的变化:充分肠道准备率(96.2% vs. 97.1%,p = 0.691)、高质量肠道准备百分比(62.5% vs. 66.7%,p = 0.529)、BBPS 平均总分(p = 0.607)、息肉检出率(66.3% vs. 77.1%,p = 0.083)以及耐受性和可接受性结果,包括满意度(p = 0.729)和重复肠道准备意愿(p = 0.744),两组间无统计学差异。不良事件以及血糖和电解质的变化无显著差异(均 p > 0.05):结论:口服乳果糖和含碳水化合物的清流液组合在肠道准备充分性和息肉检测方面不劣于 3L PEG-ELS,在耐受性和安全性方面无统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Medical Research
European Journal of Medical Research 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
247
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Medical Research publishes translational and clinical research of international interest across all medical disciplines, enabling clinicians and other researchers to learn about developments and innovations within these disciplines and across the boundaries between disciplines. The journal publishes high quality research and reviews and aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted research are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信