Public Stigma of Stroke Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study

IF 1.9 4区医学 Q2 NURSING

International Journal of Nursing Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-16 DOI:10.1111/ijn.70003

Gülcan Bahcecioglu Turan, Zülfinaz Özer, Esra Yıldız

{"title":"Public Stigma of Stroke Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study","authors":"Gülcan Bahcecioglu Turan, Zülfinaz Özer, Esra Yıldız","doi":"10.1111/ijn.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study was conducted to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Public Stigma of Stroke Scale (PSSS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The stigma perceived by patients who have had stroke affects the quality of life as well as many health-related factors. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the society's stigmatization of the stroke patient and to reveal the differences related to stroke in different cultures.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>This study is methodological research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study was conducted with 410 individuals aged 18 and over. The data were collected by using descriptive information form and PSSS. The data were evaluated by using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's Omega reliability, composite reliability, mean variance extracted and test–retest analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Factor load values of the scale items were found to vary between 0.585 and 0.904. The fit index values in the scale were found as <i>X</i><sup>2</sup>/<i>df</i> = 2.42, < 0.001, CFI = 0.934, TLI = 0.928, SRMR = 0.042 and RMSEA = 0.059. It was found that Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the factors of the scale ranged between 0.916 and 0.946, and the total Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.897. Total McDonald's omega coefficient was found to be 0.897, and McDonald's omega coefficients of the factors were found to be between 0.921 and 0.951. Total composite reliability was found to be 0.981, and total mean variance extracted was found to be 0.740. It was found that the Turkish version of the 33-item and four-factor scales was confirmed without any changes in the original scale form.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Turkish version of PSSS is a valid and reliable measurement tool for the evaluation of the stigmatization of stroke patients by the public and for use in clinical practice.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14223,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijn.70003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study was conducted to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Public Stigma of Stroke Scale (PSSS).

Background

The stigma perceived by patients who have had stroke affects the quality of life as well as many health-related factors. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the society's stigmatization of the stroke patient and to reveal the differences related to stroke in different cultures.

Design

This study is methodological research.

Methods

This study was conducted with 410 individuals aged 18 and over. The data were collected by using descriptive information form and PSSS. The data were evaluated by using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's Omega reliability, composite reliability, mean variance extracted and test–retest analysis.

Results

Factor load values of the scale items were found to vary between 0.585 and 0.904. The fit index values in the scale were found as X²/df = 2.42, < 0.001, CFI = 0.934, TLI = 0.928, SRMR = 0.042 and RMSEA = 0.059. It was found that Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the factors of the scale ranged between 0.916 and 0.946, and the total Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.897. Total McDonald's omega coefficient was found to be 0.897, and McDonald's omega coefficients of the factors were found to be between 0.921 and 0.951. Total composite reliability was found to be 0.981, and total mean variance extracted was found to be 0.740. It was found that the Turkish version of the 33-item and four-factor scales was confirmed without any changes in the original scale form.

Conclusion

Turkish version of PSSS is a valid and reliable measurement tool for the evaluation of the stigmatization of stroke patients by the public and for use in clinical practice.

查看原文本刊更多论文

卒中公众病耻感量表：土耳其语效度与信度研究

目的探讨土耳其语版卒中公众病耻感量表（PSSS）的效度和信度。脑卒中患者的耻辱感会影响生活质量以及许多与健康相关的因素。因此，有必要确定社会对中风患者的污名化，揭示不同文化中与中风相关的差异。本研究为方法学研究。方法对年龄在18岁及以上的410人进行研究。采用描述性信息表和PSSS进行数据收集。采用探索性因子分析和验证性因子分析、Cronbach’s alpha信度、McDonald’s Omega信度、复合信度、均值方差提取和重测分析对数据进行评价。结果量表项目的因子负荷值在0.585 ~ 0.904之间。量表的拟合指数值为X2/df = 2.42, < 0.001, CFI = 0.934, TLI = 0.928, SRMR = 0.042, RMSEA = 0.059。结果表明，量表各因子的Cronbach’s alpha系数在0.916 ~ 0.946之间，总Cronbach’s alpha系数为0.897。总麦当劳ω系数为0.897，各因子的麦当劳ω系数在0.921 ~ 0.951之间。总复合信度为0.981，提取的总平均方差为0.740。经确认，土耳其版的33项四因子量表没有改变原来的量表形式。结论土耳其版PSSS量表是一种有效、可靠的脑卒中患者污名化评价工具，可用于临床实践。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Nursing Practice NURSING-

CiteScore

4.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

3 months

期刊介绍： International Journal of Nursing Practice is a fully refereed journal that publishes original scholarly work that advances the international understanding and development of nursing, both as a profession and as an academic discipline. The Journal focuses on research papers and professional discussion papers that have a sound scientific, theoretical or philosophical base. Preference is given to high-quality papers written in a way that renders them accessible to a wide audience without compromising quality. The primary criteria for acceptance are excellence, relevance and clarity. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.