Renal Mass Biopsy Prior to Surgical Excision: Practice, Diagnostic Performance, and Impact on Management in the UroCCR Registry (Ancillary Study No. 118)

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Pauline Proye , Bastien Gondran-Tellier , Floriane Michel , Karim Bensalah , Pierre Bigot , François Audenet , Cécile Champy , Pierre Merlin , Franck Bruyere , Morgan Roupret , Gautier Marcq , Louis Surlemont , Bastien Parier , Thibaut Waeckel , Constance Michel , Nicolas Branger , Thibault Tricart , Clément Sarrazin , Jean-Jacques Patard , Maxime Vallée , Romain Boissier
{"title":"Renal Mass Biopsy Prior to Surgical Excision: Practice, Diagnostic Performance, and Impact on Management in the UroCCR Registry (Ancillary Study No. 118)","authors":"Pauline Proye ,&nbsp;Bastien Gondran-Tellier ,&nbsp;Floriane Michel ,&nbsp;Karim Bensalah ,&nbsp;Pierre Bigot ,&nbsp;François Audenet ,&nbsp;Cécile Champy ,&nbsp;Pierre Merlin ,&nbsp;Franck Bruyere ,&nbsp;Morgan Roupret ,&nbsp;Gautier Marcq ,&nbsp;Louis Surlemont ,&nbsp;Bastien Parier ,&nbsp;Thibaut Waeckel ,&nbsp;Constance Michel ,&nbsp;Nicolas Branger ,&nbsp;Thibault Tricart ,&nbsp;Clément Sarrazin ,&nbsp;Jean-Jacques Patard ,&nbsp;Maxime Vallée ,&nbsp;Romain Boissier","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.01.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>A renal mass biopsy (RMB) is not systematically recommended before surgical excision of a renal mass, although it has demonstrated elevated accuracy in determining renal masses with low morbidity. Our aim was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of an RMB, the clinical and tumoral factors associated with RMB practice, and the impact of an RMB on renal cell carcinoma management in a contemporary prospective national registry—UroCCR (2010–2021).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We identified all patients with a single renal mass (pT1–4 N0–2 M0 or benign) who were treated surgically and stratified them according to the performance of a prior RMB. Patients treated by active surveillance, percutaneous ablative treatment, or stereotaxic radiotherapy were excluded. Diagnostic accuracy of an RMB was determined in the RMB group. Clinical and tumoral factors associated with the practice of RMBs were analyzed using logistic regression.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>In total, 9283 patients were included, who presented 1594 tumors (17%) with a prior RMB. RMBs were 92.4% contributive. The correlation between an RMB and excision in the determination of benign/malignant disease, histological subtype, and grade are, respectively, 96.9%, 86.4%, and 52.6%. The impact of an RMB versus no prior RMB was determined according to the rate of surgical excision for benign lesion and the rate of partial nephrectomy (63.9% vs 57.8%; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>An RMB is performed rarely when its diagnostic performance is high. A prior RMB significantly changes the management of localized renal masses, with fewer surgical procedures for benign renal masses and conservative treatment in a higher proportion of patients.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>In a large and contemporary registry, we demonstrated that a renal mass biopsy has excellent diagnostic accuracy, significantly reduces renal surgery for benign masses and low-grade/stage renal cell carcinoma, and increases conservative surgical excision.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"73 ","pages":"Pages 60-67"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Urology Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168325000564","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

A renal mass biopsy (RMB) is not systematically recommended before surgical excision of a renal mass, although it has demonstrated elevated accuracy in determining renal masses with low morbidity. Our aim was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of an RMB, the clinical and tumoral factors associated with RMB practice, and the impact of an RMB on renal cell carcinoma management in a contemporary prospective national registry—UroCCR (2010–2021).

Methods

We identified all patients with a single renal mass (pT1–4 N0–2 M0 or benign) who were treated surgically and stratified them according to the performance of a prior RMB. Patients treated by active surveillance, percutaneous ablative treatment, or stereotaxic radiotherapy were excluded. Diagnostic accuracy of an RMB was determined in the RMB group. Clinical and tumoral factors associated with the practice of RMBs were analyzed using logistic regression.

Key findings and limitations

In total, 9283 patients were included, who presented 1594 tumors (17%) with a prior RMB. RMBs were 92.4% contributive. The correlation between an RMB and excision in the determination of benign/malignant disease, histological subtype, and grade are, respectively, 96.9%, 86.4%, and 52.6%. The impact of an RMB versus no prior RMB was determined according to the rate of surgical excision for benign lesion and the rate of partial nephrectomy (63.9% vs 57.8%; p < 0.001).

Conclusions and clinical implications

An RMB is performed rarely when its diagnostic performance is high. A prior RMB significantly changes the management of localized renal masses, with fewer surgical procedures for benign renal masses and conservative treatment in a higher proportion of patients.

Patient summary

In a large and contemporary registry, we demonstrated that a renal mass biopsy has excellent diagnostic accuracy, significantly reduces renal surgery for benign masses and low-grade/stage renal cell carcinoma, and increases conservative surgical excision.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Urology Open Science
European Urology Open Science UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1183
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信