Evaluation of an updated pencil beam algorithm for enhanced dosimetric accuracy in stereotactic radiotherapy

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Paul Retif , Motchy Saleh , Abdourahamane Djibo Sidikou , Romain Letellier , Anwar Al Salah , Estelle Pfletschinger , Fabian Taesch , Emilie Verrecchia-Ramos , Xavier Michel
{"title":"Evaluation of an updated pencil beam algorithm for enhanced dosimetric accuracy in stereotactic radiotherapy","authors":"Paul Retif ,&nbsp;Motchy Saleh ,&nbsp;Abdourahamane Djibo Sidikou ,&nbsp;Romain Letellier ,&nbsp;Anwar Al Salah ,&nbsp;Estelle Pfletschinger ,&nbsp;Fabian Taesch ,&nbsp;Emilie Verrecchia-Ramos ,&nbsp;Xavier Michel","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2025.104941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study evaluates enhancements introduced in version 4.0 of Brainlab’s Pencil Beam algorithm within the Elements treatment planning system (TPS) for radiotherapy dose calculations. These updates include a new scatter model to improve dose calculation accuracy and updated commissioning recommendations involving asynchronous sweeping gap (a-SG) measurements to refine multileaf collimator (MLC) parameters such as dynamic leaf shift (DLS) and tongue-and-groove (TG) size.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>The original (version 3.0) and updated (version 4.0) implementations of the Pencil Beam algorithm were compared using a Varian TrueBeam STx accelerator with 6-MV flattening filter-free energy and high-definition MLC. Dosimetric accuracy was assessed through phantom-based point dose and volumetric measurements for clinical cases, including treatments for single and multiple brain metastases with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and dynamic conformal arcs (DCA).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The updated algorithm demonstrated superior performance compared to the original version. Point dose measurements showed a reduction in discrepancies between calculated and measured doses, with improvements of up to 2.1 % for smaller targets. Volumetric measurements revealed increased gamma pass rates, with improvements of up to 15.9 % at a 95 % dose threshold in VMAT and DCA treatments.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings highlight advancements in dose calculation accuracy, particularly for small fields and multiple targets. These improvements of the Pencil Beam algorithm, driven by the scatter model and enhanced MLC parameter commissioning, contribute to more reliable dose predictions. As findings are specific to the 6-MV FFF beam and TrueBeam STx system, further investigations are needed for other energies and linear accelerators.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 104941"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179725000511","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This study evaluates enhancements introduced in version 4.0 of Brainlab’s Pencil Beam algorithm within the Elements treatment planning system (TPS) for radiotherapy dose calculations. These updates include a new scatter model to improve dose calculation accuracy and updated commissioning recommendations involving asynchronous sweeping gap (a-SG) measurements to refine multileaf collimator (MLC) parameters such as dynamic leaf shift (DLS) and tongue-and-groove (TG) size.

Materials and methods

The original (version 3.0) and updated (version 4.0) implementations of the Pencil Beam algorithm were compared using a Varian TrueBeam STx accelerator with 6-MV flattening filter-free energy and high-definition MLC. Dosimetric accuracy was assessed through phantom-based point dose and volumetric measurements for clinical cases, including treatments for single and multiple brain metastases with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and dynamic conformal arcs (DCA).

Results

The updated algorithm demonstrated superior performance compared to the original version. Point dose measurements showed a reduction in discrepancies between calculated and measured doses, with improvements of up to 2.1 % for smaller targets. Volumetric measurements revealed increased gamma pass rates, with improvements of up to 15.9 % at a 95 % dose threshold in VMAT and DCA treatments.

Conclusion

These findings highlight advancements in dose calculation accuracy, particularly for small fields and multiple targets. These improvements of the Pencil Beam algorithm, driven by the scatter model and enhanced MLC parameter commissioning, contribute to more reliable dose predictions. As findings are specific to the 6-MV FFF beam and TrueBeam STx system, further investigations are needed for other energies and linear accelerators.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
493
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics: Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy Radiation Protection Measuring Systems and Signal Processing Education and training in Medical Physics Professional issues in Medical Physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信