Microsurgical clipping for intracranial aneurysms in elderly patients: outcomes comparable to those in younger cohorts.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Joanna M Roy, Basel Musmar, Matthews Lan, Shyam Majmundar, Cheritesh Amaravadi, Sarah Winiker, Charles Morse, Erica Sais, Shray Patel, Kareem El Naamani, Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris, M Reid Gooch, Robert H Rosenwasser, Pascal M Jabbour
{"title":"Microsurgical clipping for intracranial aneurysms in elderly patients: outcomes comparable to those in younger cohorts.","authors":"Joanna M Roy, Basel Musmar, Matthews Lan, Shyam Majmundar, Cheritesh Amaravadi, Sarah Winiker, Charles Morse, Erica Sais, Shray Patel, Kareem El Naamani, Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris, M Reid Gooch, Robert H Rosenwasser, Pascal M Jabbour","doi":"10.3171/2024.10.JNS242494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In recent years, there has been a shift toward the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms, particularly among elderly patients, that is, those aged 70 years and older. However, microsurgical clipping remains the preferred modality for aneurysms of a certain morphology and location. The authors of this study aimed to compare the outcomes of clipping on the basis of age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective single-center study of patients who had undergone microsurgical clipping of an intracranial aneurysm between February 2016 and November 2022. Propensity scores were estimated using the 1:2 nearest neighbor method. Outcomes of interest were intraoperative and postoperative complications, length of stay (LOS), nonhome discharge (NHD), functional dependence on discharge, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, 50 patients older than 70 years were matched with 100 patients younger than 70 years of age. Aneurysm location, morphology, and rupture status were comparable between the matched cohorts. There was no significant difference in complications (14.0% for age ≥ 70 vs 13.0% for age < 70, p > 0.99), extended LOS (30% vs 19%, respectively, p = 0.129), NHD (38.0% vs 26.0%, respectively, p = 0.131), functional dependence on discharge (22% vs 17%, respectively, p = 0.509), or mortality (8.0% vs 2.0%, respectively, p = 0.077).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study results demonstrated rates of complications, LOS, NHD, functional dependence, and mortality in elderly patients comparable to those in younger patients. The authors acknowledge the importance of patient selection and encourage further studies to assess the safety of clipping in the elderly.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.10.JNS242494","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In recent years, there has been a shift toward the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms, particularly among elderly patients, that is, those aged 70 years and older. However, microsurgical clipping remains the preferred modality for aneurysms of a certain morphology and location. The authors of this study aimed to compare the outcomes of clipping on the basis of age.

Methods: This was a retrospective single-center study of patients who had undergone microsurgical clipping of an intracranial aneurysm between February 2016 and November 2022. Propensity scores were estimated using the 1:2 nearest neighbor method. Outcomes of interest were intraoperative and postoperative complications, length of stay (LOS), nonhome discharge (NHD), functional dependence on discharge, and mortality.

Results: After propensity score matching, 50 patients older than 70 years were matched with 100 patients younger than 70 years of age. Aneurysm location, morphology, and rupture status were comparable between the matched cohorts. There was no significant difference in complications (14.0% for age ≥ 70 vs 13.0% for age < 70, p > 0.99), extended LOS (30% vs 19%, respectively, p = 0.129), NHD (38.0% vs 26.0%, respectively, p = 0.131), functional dependence on discharge (22% vs 17%, respectively, p = 0.509), or mortality (8.0% vs 2.0%, respectively, p = 0.077).

Conclusions: The study results demonstrated rates of complications, LOS, NHD, functional dependence, and mortality in elderly patients comparable to those in younger patients. The authors acknowledge the importance of patient selection and encourage further studies to assess the safety of clipping in the elderly.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信