Incorrectly Charted Operating Rooms, With Resulting Overlapping Times, Corrected Using Meta-Data From Monitors Transmitting Pulse Oximetry Measurements.

IF 0.5 Q4 ANESTHESIOLOGY
A&A practice Pub Date : 2025-02-14 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1213/XAA.0000000000001917
Franklin Dexter, Michael G Pomeroy, Anil A Marian, Unyime S Ituk, Richard H Epstein
{"title":"Incorrectly Charted Operating Rooms, With Resulting Overlapping Times, Corrected Using Meta-Data From Monitors Transmitting Pulse Oximetry Measurements.","authors":"Franklin Dexter, Michael G Pomeroy, Anil A Marian, Unyime S Ituk, Richard H Epstein","doi":"10.1213/XAA.0000000000001917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recorded operating rooms (ORs) in electronic health records can differ from the actual anesthetizing locations. A retrospective cohort of cases revealed a 40% (846/2123) room location error rate in the obstetrical (OB) suite compared to 0.03% (18/56,044) in 3 large surgical suites. Using meta-data providing physical locations of monitors transmitting pulse oximetry measurements and technicians' manual logs of replacement monitors, all actual ORs of the cases were determined. Simply identifying listed overlaps of cases in the same OR to identify potential location errors was insufficient for OB because surgical cases were infrequently ongoing simultaneously. We recommend overlap checking by suite.</p>","PeriodicalId":56372,"journal":{"name":"A&A practice","volume":"19 2","pages":"e01917"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A&A practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/XAA.0000000000001917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recorded operating rooms (ORs) in electronic health records can differ from the actual anesthetizing locations. A retrospective cohort of cases revealed a 40% (846/2123) room location error rate in the obstetrical (OB) suite compared to 0.03% (18/56,044) in 3 large surgical suites. Using meta-data providing physical locations of monitors transmitting pulse oximetry measurements and technicians' manual logs of replacement monitors, all actual ORs of the cases were determined. Simply identifying listed overlaps of cases in the same OR to identify potential location errors was insufficient for OB because surgical cases were infrequently ongoing simultaneously. We recommend overlap checking by suite.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
A&A practice
A&A practice Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
126
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信