Neuropsychological tests of social cognition in non-Western countries and in individuals from ethnic minoritized groups in Western countries: A systematic review.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1037/neu0000974
Natali Farran, Lucia Valmaggia, Natalie Tadros, Robin Morris
{"title":"Neuropsychological tests of social cognition in non-Western countries and in individuals from ethnic minoritized groups in Western countries: A systematic review.","authors":"Natali Farran, Lucia Valmaggia, Natalie Tadros, Robin Morris","doi":"10.1037/neu0000974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review identifies social cognition tests that have been developed or standardized and validated on adults specifically in non-Western countries or individuals from ethic minoritized groups in Western countries. It provides an overview of them, appraising their quality and examining their psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022337166), and the search was run on APA PsycTests and on APA PsycInfo, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Global Health until December 30, 2023. The searched domains were social perception, understanding, and decision making. Eligible studies had tests used on adult healthy or clinical groups within the target population. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments guidelines were followed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-five eligible articles were identified and included 23 newly developed tests and 51 standardized or validated ones. Most studies were conducted in Asia, and the most frequently measured functions were emotion perception and theory of mind. Several tests were culturally adapted, and many were translated and back translated. The quality of procedures and the psychometric properties varied, with construct validity rated most favorably.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The review documents promising procedures for experimental or clinical use and identifies areas for further development. This includes, for example, developing tests for more diverse individuals and accelerating test sharing. There is also the need to form consensus frameworks for describing and measuring social cognitive constructs that consider cross-cultural variation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":19205,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology","volume":"39 2","pages":"89-136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000974","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This review identifies social cognition tests that have been developed or standardized and validated on adults specifically in non-Western countries or individuals from ethic minoritized groups in Western countries. It provides an overview of them, appraising their quality and examining their psychometric properties.

Method: The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022337166), and the search was run on APA PsycTests and on APA PsycInfo, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Global Health until December 30, 2023. The searched domains were social perception, understanding, and decision making. Eligible studies had tests used on adult healthy or clinical groups within the target population. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments guidelines were followed.

Results: Eighty-five eligible articles were identified and included 23 newly developed tests and 51 standardized or validated ones. Most studies were conducted in Asia, and the most frequently measured functions were emotion perception and theory of mind. Several tests were culturally adapted, and many were translated and back translated. The quality of procedures and the psychometric properties varied, with construct validity rated most favorably.

Conclusions: The review documents promising procedures for experimental or clinical use and identifies areas for further development. This includes, for example, developing tests for more diverse individuals and accelerating test sharing. There is also the need to form consensus frameworks for describing and measuring social cognitive constructs that consider cross-cultural variation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

非西方国家和西方国家少数民族群体的社会认知神经心理学测试:系统综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychology
Neuropsychology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychology publishes original, empirical research; systematic reviews and meta-analyses; and theoretical articles on the relation between brain and human cognitive, emotional, and behavioral function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信