Study on the Assessment Method of Occupational Radiation Dose to Interventional Radiology Staff Wearing Two Personal Dosimeters in China for the Period 2015-2021.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Shengnan Fan, Wenshan Zhou, Mengxue Li, Tuo Wang, Jun Deng, Quanfu Sun
{"title":"Study on the Assessment Method of Occupational Radiation Dose to Interventional Radiology Staff Wearing Two Personal Dosimeters in China for the Period 2015-2021.","authors":"Shengnan Fan, Wenshan Zhou, Mengxue Li, Tuo Wang, Jun Deng, Quanfu Sun","doi":"10.1097/HP.0000000000001961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Considering workers in interventional radiology occupationally exposed to relatively higher radiation dose, it is imperative to reasonably and reliably assess the occupational exposure of these workers. This paper presents a method to evaluate the occupational exposure to the interventional radiology workers monitored by using two personal dosimeters, based on data from 115,997 workers collected by the Chinese Registry of Radiation Workers in China during the period 2015-2021. It was observed that only 17.7% (20,572 in 115,997) of interventional radiology staff had a meaningful measurable result. The scatter plot of Hp(10)over-Hp(10)under vs. Hp(10)over was obtained to classify between the proper use group and misuse group. In addition, it was found that the effective dose calculated using the single-dosimeter approach proposed by Martin and Magee was close to those obtained using two other double-dosimeter approaches. Furthermore, the Swiss ordinance algorithm was chosen to assess the occupational exposure as a conservative estimation method. Meanwhile, it was also found that the average annual effective dose in tertiary hospitals is significantly higher than that in secondary hospitals in China (Z = -2.491, p < 0.05/3 = 0.017). Based on these observations, rigorous surveillance, quality control measures, and better workload management are still necessary to correctly evaluate the occupational exposure of interventional radiology staff. Our results are expected to provide a feasible and accurate method for the evaluation of occupational radiation dose to interventional radiology staff wearing two personal dosimeters and contribute to effective prevention and control of radiation health risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":12976,"journal":{"name":"Health physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000001961","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Considering workers in interventional radiology occupationally exposed to relatively higher radiation dose, it is imperative to reasonably and reliably assess the occupational exposure of these workers. This paper presents a method to evaluate the occupational exposure to the interventional radiology workers monitored by using two personal dosimeters, based on data from 115,997 workers collected by the Chinese Registry of Radiation Workers in China during the period 2015-2021. It was observed that only 17.7% (20,572 in 115,997) of interventional radiology staff had a meaningful measurable result. The scatter plot of Hp(10)over-Hp(10)under vs. Hp(10)over was obtained to classify between the proper use group and misuse group. In addition, it was found that the effective dose calculated using the single-dosimeter approach proposed by Martin and Magee was close to those obtained using two other double-dosimeter approaches. Furthermore, the Swiss ordinance algorithm was chosen to assess the occupational exposure as a conservative estimation method. Meanwhile, it was also found that the average annual effective dose in tertiary hospitals is significantly higher than that in secondary hospitals in China (Z = -2.491, p < 0.05/3 = 0.017). Based on these observations, rigorous surveillance, quality control measures, and better workload management are still necessary to correctly evaluate the occupational exposure of interventional radiology staff. Our results are expected to provide a feasible and accurate method for the evaluation of occupational radiation dose to interventional radiology staff wearing two personal dosimeters and contribute to effective prevention and control of radiation health risks.

2015-2021年中国穿戴两台个人剂量计的介入放射工作人员职业辐射剂量评估方法研究
摘要:介入放射工作人员的职业暴露量相对较高,合理、可靠地进行职业暴露评估势在必行。本文基于2015-2021年中国辐射工作人员登记所收集的115997名介入放射工作人员的职业暴露数据,提出了一种使用两台个人剂量仪监测介入放射工作人员的职业暴露评估方法。115,997名介入放射科工作人员中,仅有17.7%(20,572人)具有有意义的可测量结果。通过Hp(10)过高Hp(10)低于Hp(10)与Hp(10)过高Hp(10)的散点图对正确使用组和误用组进行分类。此外,还发现使用Martin和Magee提出的单剂量计方法计算的有效剂量与使用另外两种双剂量计方法计算的有效剂量接近。此外,选择瑞士法令算法作为保守估计方法来评估职业暴露。同时,还发现三级医院的年平均有效剂量显著高于二级医院(Z = -2.491, p < 0.05/3 = 0.017)。基于这些观察结果,仍然需要严格的监测、质量控制措施和更好的工作量管理来正确评估介入放射工作人员的职业暴露。本研究结果有望为佩戴双剂量仪的介入放射工作人员的职业辐射剂量评估提供一种可行、准确的方法,有助于有效预防和控制辐射健康风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health physics
Health physics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
324
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Physics, first published in 1958, provides the latest research to a wide variety of radiation safety professionals including health physicists, nuclear chemists, medical physicists, and radiation safety officers with interests in nuclear and radiation science. The Journal allows professionals in these and other disciplines in science and engineering to stay on the cutting edge of scientific and technological advances in the field of radiation safety. The Journal publishes original papers, technical notes, articles on advances in practical applications, editorials, and correspondence. Journal articles report on the latest findings in theoretical, practical, and applied disciplines of epidemiology and radiation effects, radiation biology and radiation science, radiation ecology, and related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信