Efficacy and safety of intensive blood pressure control in patients over 60 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Huarong Yang, Haiyan Xing, Xue Zou, Meihua Jin, Yang Li, Ke Xiao, Li Cai, Yao Liu, Xue Yang
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of intensive blood pressure control in patients over 60 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Huarong Yang, Haiyan Xing, Xue Zou, Meihua Jin, Yang Li, Ke Xiao, Li Cai, Yao Liu, Xue Yang","doi":"10.1080/10641963.2025.2465399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intensive blood pressure control in patients over 60 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Databases including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library were searched from inception through February 1, 2024. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy or safety of intensive blood pressure control in patients over 60 years were included in the meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intensive blood pressure control in individuals with mild hypertension has been shown to reduce the risk of heart failure, stroke, myocardial infarction, major cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality. The benefits of intensive blood pressure control in patients with moderate to severe hypertension are comparable to those observed in individuals with mild hypertension, with the exception of a reduced impact on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. Compared with maintaining systolic blood pressure (SBP) above 140 mmHg, SBP below 140 mmHg is associated with a decreased risk of major cardiovascular events in patients aged over 70, as well as a reduced risk of stroke in patients aged 60-69. Furthermore, compared to maintaining SBP above 130 mmHg, SBP below 130 mmHg is linked to a lower risk of major cardiovascular events, heart failure and myocardial infarction in patients over 60, a reduced risk of stroke and cardiovascular mortality in patients aged 60-69, and a decreased risk of all-cause mortality in patients over 70. However, a lower baseline blood pressure or more aggressive blood pressure control may be associated with an increased risk of hypotension.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with hypertension aged over 60 years can derive benefits from intensive blood pressure management without experiencing significant adverse events, aside from hypotension.</p>","PeriodicalId":10333,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Hypertension","volume":"47 1","pages":"2465399"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10641963.2025.2465399","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intensive blood pressure control in patients over 60 years.

Methods: Databases including PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library were searched from inception through February 1, 2024. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy or safety of intensive blood pressure control in patients over 60 years were included in the meta-analysis.

Results: Intensive blood pressure control in individuals with mild hypertension has been shown to reduce the risk of heart failure, stroke, myocardial infarction, major cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality. The benefits of intensive blood pressure control in patients with moderate to severe hypertension are comparable to those observed in individuals with mild hypertension, with the exception of a reduced impact on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality. Compared with maintaining systolic blood pressure (SBP) above 140 mmHg, SBP below 140 mmHg is associated with a decreased risk of major cardiovascular events in patients aged over 70, as well as a reduced risk of stroke in patients aged 60-69. Furthermore, compared to maintaining SBP above 130 mmHg, SBP below 130 mmHg is linked to a lower risk of major cardiovascular events, heart failure and myocardial infarction in patients over 60, a reduced risk of stroke and cardiovascular mortality in patients aged 60-69, and a decreased risk of all-cause mortality in patients over 70. However, a lower baseline blood pressure or more aggressive blood pressure control may be associated with an increased risk of hypotension.

Conclusions: Patients with hypertension aged over 60 years can derive benefits from intensive blood pressure management without experiencing significant adverse events, aside from hypotension.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.80%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Hypertension is a reputable journal that has converted to a full Open Access format starting from Volume 45 in 2023. While previous volumes are still accessible through a Pay to Read model, the journal now provides free and open access to its content. It serves as an international platform for the exchange of up-to-date scientific and clinical information concerning both human and animal hypertension. The journal publishes a wide range of articles, including full research papers, solicited and unsolicited reviews, and commentaries. Through these publications, the journal aims to enhance current understanding and support the timely detection, management, control, and prevention of hypertension-related conditions. One notable aspect of Clinical and Experimental Hypertension is its coverage of special issues that focus on the proceedings of symposia dedicated to hypertension research. This feature allows researchers and clinicians to delve deeper into the latest advancements in this field. The journal is abstracted and indexed in several renowned databases, including Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes News (Online), Reactions Weekly (Online), CABI, EBSCOhost, Elsevier BV, International Atomic Energy Agency, and the National Library of Medicine, among others. These affiliations ensure that the journal's content receives broad visibility and facilitates its discoverability by professionals and researchers in related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信