Fuzzy approaches provide improved spatial detection of coastal dune EU habitats

IF 5.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Emilia Pafumi , Claudia Angiolini , Giovanni Bacaro , Emanuele Fanfarillo , Tiberio Fiaschi , Duccio Rocchini , Simona Sarmati , Michele Torresani , Hannes Feilhauer , Simona Maccherini
{"title":"Fuzzy approaches provide improved spatial detection of coastal dune EU habitats","authors":"Emilia Pafumi ,&nbsp;Claudia Angiolini ,&nbsp;Giovanni Bacaro ,&nbsp;Emanuele Fanfarillo ,&nbsp;Tiberio Fiaschi ,&nbsp;Duccio Rocchini ,&nbsp;Simona Sarmati ,&nbsp;Michele Torresani ,&nbsp;Hannes Feilhauer ,&nbsp;Simona Maccherini","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mapping habitats on coastal dunes, crucial yet highly vulnerable ecosystems, requires objectivity and repeatability, which are still lacking in the implementation of the Habitats Directive. Although remote sensing offers promising solutions, the effectiveness of distinguishing habitats on coastal dunes from satellite imagery remains uncertain. In this study, we compare crisp and fuzzy classification approaches using WorldView-3 imagery to map coastal dune habitats in two Natural Parks of Tuscany (Italy).</div><div>Field-collected vegetation data were classified into Annex I habitats of Habitats Directive and EUNIS habitats. Using field data as reference, we performed image classifications with a crisp method (Random Forests) and three fuzzy methods, namely Random Forests, Spectral Angle Mapper and Multiple Endmember Spectral Mixture Analysis. Metrics of overall accuracy and Mantel tests were used to compare the results.</div><div>EUNIS habitats exhibited the best performance in terms of classification accuracy, likely due to the simpler classification system. We observed a great disparity among habitats, with coastal dune scrubs and white dunes generally achieving the highest accuracy. Fuzzy classifications, despite yielding lower overall accuracy than the crisp classification, provided a more realistic representation of vegetation patterns, highlighting the inherent fuzziness of vegetation in coastal dunes. Despite challenges related to image resolution and habitat heterogeneity, combining satellite imagery with field surveys proved valuable for mapping coastal dune habitats, contributing essential data to the conservation of these fragile ecosystems. We provide a novel and effective tool, which will reduce the economic and physical efforts needed for habitat search and sampling in the field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51024,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Informatics","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 103059"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1574954125000688","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mapping habitats on coastal dunes, crucial yet highly vulnerable ecosystems, requires objectivity and repeatability, which are still lacking in the implementation of the Habitats Directive. Although remote sensing offers promising solutions, the effectiveness of distinguishing habitats on coastal dunes from satellite imagery remains uncertain. In this study, we compare crisp and fuzzy classification approaches using WorldView-3 imagery to map coastal dune habitats in two Natural Parks of Tuscany (Italy).
Field-collected vegetation data were classified into Annex I habitats of Habitats Directive and EUNIS habitats. Using field data as reference, we performed image classifications with a crisp method (Random Forests) and three fuzzy methods, namely Random Forests, Spectral Angle Mapper and Multiple Endmember Spectral Mixture Analysis. Metrics of overall accuracy and Mantel tests were used to compare the results.
EUNIS habitats exhibited the best performance in terms of classification accuracy, likely due to the simpler classification system. We observed a great disparity among habitats, with coastal dune scrubs and white dunes generally achieving the highest accuracy. Fuzzy classifications, despite yielding lower overall accuracy than the crisp classification, provided a more realistic representation of vegetation patterns, highlighting the inherent fuzziness of vegetation in coastal dunes. Despite challenges related to image resolution and habitat heterogeneity, combining satellite imagery with field surveys proved valuable for mapping coastal dune habitats, contributing essential data to the conservation of these fragile ecosystems. We provide a novel and effective tool, which will reduce the economic and physical efforts needed for habitat search and sampling in the field.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Informatics
Ecological Informatics 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
346
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The journal Ecological Informatics is devoted to the publication of high quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of computational ecology, data science and biogeography. The scope of the journal takes into account the data-intensive nature of ecology, the growing capacity of information technology to access, harness and leverage complex data as well as the critical need for informing sustainable management in view of global environmental and climate change. The nature of the journal is interdisciplinary at the crossover between ecology and informatics. It focuses on novel concepts and techniques for image- and genome-based monitoring and interpretation, sensor- and multimedia-based data acquisition, internet-based data archiving and sharing, data assimilation, modelling and prediction of ecological data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信