Perspectives regarding consumer sleep technology and barriers to its use or adoption among adults in the United States

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mary Kress , Nicholas R. Lenze , Ruby J. Kazemi , Allison K. Ikeda , Punithavathy Vijayakumar , Cathy A. Goldstein , Jeffrey J. Stanley , Michael J. Brenner , Paul T. Hoff
{"title":"Perspectives regarding consumer sleep technology and barriers to its use or adoption among adults in the United States","authors":"Mary Kress ,&nbsp;Nicholas R. Lenze ,&nbsp;Ruby J. Kazemi ,&nbsp;Allison K. Ikeda ,&nbsp;Punithavathy Vijayakumar ,&nbsp;Cathy A. Goldstein ,&nbsp;Jeffrey J. Stanley ,&nbsp;Michael J. Brenner ,&nbsp;Paul T. Hoff","doi":"10.1016/j.sleep.2025.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore perspectives about consumer sleep technology (CST) and barriers to its regular use and whether these vary by sociodemographic characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multidisciplinary team developed a survey instrument which was disseminated to a national sample via an online platform. A mixed methods analysis using descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and thematic content analysis was employed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 897 survey respondents, mean age was 47.5 ± 16.9 years; 73.1 % identified as female, and 81.8 % as White. A total of 505 respondents (56.3 %) reported having tracked their sleep using CST. Concerns or barriers reported by respondents included cost (57.2 %), too many different types of CST (56.5 %), and data privacy/security concerns (38.7 %). Younger individuals (p &lt; 0.001) and those with annual household income $30,000 to $57,999 per year (p = 0.006) or &lt;$30,000 per year (p = 0.021) were more likely to report cost as a barrier in the adjusted analysis. Individuals with household income &lt;$30,000 (p = 0.004) or identifying as Asian (p = 0.002) or Black (p = 0.004) race were more likely to report data privacy/security concerns. Among those who already owned CST, 12.3 % reported sleep-related worry/orthosomnia and 17 % reported not trusting the data. Qualitative analyses corroborated these findings, emphasizing concerns with data privacy/security, sleep-related worry, lack of trust in data accuracy, and physical discomfort.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Despite the growing popularity of CST, there exist several concerns and barriers to its regular use that may have health equity implications. Further research incorporating diverse stakeholders is necessary to address these barriers and promote optimal use of technology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21874,"journal":{"name":"Sleep medicine","volume":"128 ","pages":"Pages 165-173"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389945725000498","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To explore perspectives about consumer sleep technology (CST) and barriers to its regular use and whether these vary by sociodemographic characteristics.

Methods

A multidisciplinary team developed a survey instrument which was disseminated to a national sample via an online platform. A mixed methods analysis using descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and thematic content analysis was employed.

Results

Among 897 survey respondents, mean age was 47.5 ± 16.9 years; 73.1 % identified as female, and 81.8 % as White. A total of 505 respondents (56.3 %) reported having tracked their sleep using CST. Concerns or barriers reported by respondents included cost (57.2 %), too many different types of CST (56.5 %), and data privacy/security concerns (38.7 %). Younger individuals (p < 0.001) and those with annual household income $30,000 to $57,999 per year (p = 0.006) or <$30,000 per year (p = 0.021) were more likely to report cost as a barrier in the adjusted analysis. Individuals with household income <$30,000 (p = 0.004) or identifying as Asian (p = 0.002) or Black (p = 0.004) race were more likely to report data privacy/security concerns. Among those who already owned CST, 12.3 % reported sleep-related worry/orthosomnia and 17 % reported not trusting the data. Qualitative analyses corroborated these findings, emphasizing concerns with data privacy/security, sleep-related worry, lack of trust in data accuracy, and physical discomfort.

Conclusions

Despite the growing popularity of CST, there exist several concerns and barriers to its regular use that may have health equity implications. Further research incorporating diverse stakeholders is necessary to address these barriers and promote optimal use of technology.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sleep medicine
Sleep medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1060
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Sleep Medicine aims to be a journal no one involved in clinical sleep medicine can do without. A journal primarily focussing on the human aspects of sleep, integrating the various disciplines that are involved in sleep medicine: neurology, clinical neurophysiology, internal medicine (particularly pulmonology and cardiology), psychology, psychiatry, sleep technology, pediatrics, neurosurgery, otorhinolaryngology, and dentistry. The journal publishes the following types of articles: Reviews (also intended as a way to bridge the gap between basic sleep research and clinical relevance); Original Research Articles; Full-length articles; Brief communications; Controversies; Case reports; Letters to the Editor; Journal search and commentaries; Book reviews; Meeting announcements; Listing of relevant organisations plus web sites.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信