Editorial Commentary: Utility of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate in Orthopaedic Surgery Remains Questionable.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Carl K Schillhammer
{"title":"Editorial Commentary: Utility of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate in Orthopaedic Surgery Remains Questionable.","authors":"Carl K Schillhammer","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite multiple advancements in rotator cuff repair fixation and technique that have allowed for stronger and more anatomic constructs, failure remains commonplace. As is a common theme throughout orthopaedics, both biomechanics and biology play a role in successful healing. The new frontier in tendon-to-bone healing appears to be pairing biologic augmentation, such as bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), with previous biomechanical advancements. However, only 8 studies have specifically investigated the utility of BMAC in rotator cuff repair, and as of yet, there are minimal data to suggest that recent biologic technologies have shown clinical effectiveness. The technology has been more comprehensively studied in knee arthritis with similarly disappointing clinical results. Rotator cuff repair outcomes are dependent on many factors inherent to the injury (e.g., chronicity, bone quality, tendon quality, retraction), the patient (e.g., age, smoking, diabetes, adherence to postoperative protocol), and the surgeon (e.g., quality of technique, repair tension, patient education). Trying to decide the efficacy of BMAC or other cell-based technology is going to be very difficult.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.01.060","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite multiple advancements in rotator cuff repair fixation and technique that have allowed for stronger and more anatomic constructs, failure remains commonplace. As is a common theme throughout orthopaedics, both biomechanics and biology play a role in successful healing. The new frontier in tendon-to-bone healing appears to be pairing biologic augmentation, such as bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), with previous biomechanical advancements. However, only 8 studies have specifically investigated the utility of BMAC in rotator cuff repair, and as of yet, there are minimal data to suggest that recent biologic technologies have shown clinical effectiveness. The technology has been more comprehensively studied in knee arthritis with similarly disappointing clinical results. Rotator cuff repair outcomes are dependent on many factors inherent to the injury (e.g., chronicity, bone quality, tendon quality, retraction), the patient (e.g., age, smoking, diabetes, adherence to postoperative protocol), and the surgeon (e.g., quality of technique, repair tension, patient education). Trying to decide the efficacy of BMAC or other cell-based technology is going to be very difficult.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信