Patient Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Hand Surgery: A Survey of 511 Patients Presenting to a Hand Surgery Clinic.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Sebastian D Arango, Jason C Flynn, Jacob Zeitlin, Samuel H Payne, Andrew J Miller, Tristan B Weir
{"title":"Patient Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Hand Surgery: A Survey of 511 Patients Presenting to a Hand Surgery Clinic.","authors":"Sebastian D Arango, Jason C Flynn, Jacob Zeitlin, Samuel H Payne, Andrew J Miller, Tristan B Weir","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate patient awareness and perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots in a hand surgery clinic setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 16-question, multiple-choice, paper survey was administered to adult patients at five urban and suburban hand clinic locations from February to March 2024. The anonymous survey assessed patient characteristics and patient familiarity, usage, and trust toward chatbots in hand surgery. Descriptive statistics summarized the survey results, whereas multivariable logistic regression analyses determined the factors associated with positive perceptions of AI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 564 surveys administered, 511 (91%) were completed in their entirety and were included in the study. Most patients (81%) reported having at least basic familiarity with computers and smartphones, whereas 45% had never heard of specific AI chatbots (eg, ChatGPT). Only 3.9% of patients frequently use chatbots in daily life, whereas 70% have never used a chatbot. Only 14.1% of patients stated that they were likely to use chatbots to answer questions about their upper-extremity condition. Similarly, low proportions were likely to trust chatbots to accurately answer questions (14.7%), make a diagnosis (9.0%), make appropriate treatment recommendations (11.9%), and help manage complications (10.8%). A greater proportion thought chatbots would play an important role in their future upper- extremity care (18.6%). Positive perceptions of chatbots were associated with uninsured payment status and those with a college degree, whereas patients who were older or who had greater familiarity with technology were less likely to have positive perceptions of chatbots.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As AI is increasingly integrated into medical practice, many hand clinic patients remain unaware of or uncertain about its role in their care.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Although certain populations had positive attitudes toward chatbots, enhancing patient education about the role and benefits of AI, as well as ensuring transparency, may facilitate its integration into patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.01.004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate patient awareness and perceptions of artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots in a hand surgery clinic setting.

Methods: A 16-question, multiple-choice, paper survey was administered to adult patients at five urban and suburban hand clinic locations from February to March 2024. The anonymous survey assessed patient characteristics and patient familiarity, usage, and trust toward chatbots in hand surgery. Descriptive statistics summarized the survey results, whereas multivariable logistic regression analyses determined the factors associated with positive perceptions of AI.

Results: Of the 564 surveys administered, 511 (91%) were completed in their entirety and were included in the study. Most patients (81%) reported having at least basic familiarity with computers and smartphones, whereas 45% had never heard of specific AI chatbots (eg, ChatGPT). Only 3.9% of patients frequently use chatbots in daily life, whereas 70% have never used a chatbot. Only 14.1% of patients stated that they were likely to use chatbots to answer questions about their upper-extremity condition. Similarly, low proportions were likely to trust chatbots to accurately answer questions (14.7%), make a diagnosis (9.0%), make appropriate treatment recommendations (11.9%), and help manage complications (10.8%). A greater proportion thought chatbots would play an important role in their future upper- extremity care (18.6%). Positive perceptions of chatbots were associated with uninsured payment status and those with a college degree, whereas patients who were older or who had greater familiarity with technology were less likely to have positive perceptions of chatbots.

Conclusions: As AI is increasingly integrated into medical practice, many hand clinic patients remain unaware of or uncertain about its role in their care.

Clinical relevance: Although certain populations had positive attitudes toward chatbots, enhancing patient education about the role and benefits of AI, as well as ensuring transparency, may facilitate its integration into patient care.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信