Literature review and expert opinion on diagnosis and current management of generalized pustular psoriasis.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-13 DOI:10.1080/14712598.2025.2464858
Angelo Valerio Marzano, Maria Concetta Fargnoli, Paolo Gisondi, Anna Balato, Luca Bianchi, Piergiacomo Calzavara-Pinton, Andrea Chiricozzi, Antonio Costanzo, Matteo Megna, Giuseppe Micali, Stefano Piaserico, Francesca Prignano
{"title":"Literature review and expert opinion on diagnosis and current management of generalized pustular psoriasis.","authors":"Angelo Valerio Marzano, Maria Concetta Fargnoli, Paolo Gisondi, Anna Balato, Luca Bianchi, Piergiacomo Calzavara-Pinton, Andrea Chiricozzi, Antonio Costanzo, Matteo Megna, Giuseppe Micali, Stefano Piaserico, Francesca Prignano","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2025.2464858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare, chronic, systemic, autoinflammatory disease characterized by the eruption of sterile pustules, often accompanied by more general symptoms, such as fever, fatigue, and a burning sensation in the skin. GPP can be potentially life-threatening, if untreated, as it can lead to complications, such as sepsis and heart failure.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this literature review and expert opinion article, we provide an overview of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of GPP. Eleven dermatologists representing seven different Italian regions considered relevant evidence in the literature to discuss the current diagnosis and treatment of GPP. The expert panel of dermatologists identified several weaknesses in the current clinical management of GPP.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>There is an inconsistent definition and classification of the disease across the literature, which can lead to misdiagnosis and delay in disease treatment. Furthermore, there are no international and standardized clinical guidelines on disease management, especially in Europe. There is a profound need for the development of novel therapeutic agents with sustained efficacy to decrease the impact of the comorbidities and mortality associated with GPP, prevent the onset of complications, and support the unmet needs of these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"265-273"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2464858","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare, chronic, systemic, autoinflammatory disease characterized by the eruption of sterile pustules, often accompanied by more general symptoms, such as fever, fatigue, and a burning sensation in the skin. GPP can be potentially life-threatening, if untreated, as it can lead to complications, such as sepsis and heart failure.

Areas covered: In this literature review and expert opinion article, we provide an overview of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of GPP. Eleven dermatologists representing seven different Italian regions considered relevant evidence in the literature to discuss the current diagnosis and treatment of GPP. The expert panel of dermatologists identified several weaknesses in the current clinical management of GPP.

Expert opinion: There is an inconsistent definition and classification of the disease across the literature, which can lead to misdiagnosis and delay in disease treatment. Furthermore, there are no international and standardized clinical guidelines on disease management, especially in Europe. There is a profound need for the development of novel therapeutic agents with sustained efficacy to decrease the impact of the comorbidities and mortality associated with GPP, prevent the onset of complications, and support the unmet needs of these patients.

广泛性脓疱性银屑病的诊断与治疗的文献综述及专家意见。
简介:全身性脓疱性牛皮癣(GPP)是一种罕见的慢性、全身性、自身炎症性疾病,其特征是无菌脓疱的爆发,通常伴有更一般的症状,如发烧、疲劳和皮肤灼烧感。如果不治疗,GPP可能会危及生命,因为它可能导致败血症和心力衰竭等并发症。涉及领域:在这篇文献综述和专家意见文章中,我们概述了GPP的流行病学、发病机制、临床表现、诊断和治疗。代表意大利7个不同地区的11位皮肤科医生考虑了文献中的相关证据,讨论了目前GPP的诊断和治疗。皮肤科专家小组确定了目前GPP临床管理中的几个弱点。专家意见:文献中对该病的定义和分类不一致,这可能导致误诊和延误疾病治疗。此外,没有关于疾病管理的国际和标准化临床指南,特别是在欧洲。迫切需要开发具有持续疗效的新型治疗药物,以减少与GPP相关的合并症和死亡率的影响,预防并发症的发生,并支持这些患者未满足的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy 医学-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development. The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease. The journal welcomes: Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results; Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信