Chest Compressions Synchronized to Native Cardiac Contractions are More Effective than Unsynchronized Compressions for Improving Coronary Perfusion Pressure in a Novel Pseudo-PEA Swine Model.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Keith A Marill, James J Menegazzi, Jorge A Gumucio, Rameen Forghani, David D Salcido
{"title":"Chest Compressions Synchronized to Native Cardiac Contractions are More Effective than Unsynchronized Compressions for Improving Coronary Perfusion Pressure in a Novel Pseudo-PEA Swine Model.","authors":"Keith A Marill, James J Menegazzi, Jorge A Gumucio, Rameen Forghani, David D Salcido","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2463633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pulseless electrical activity (PEA) arrest, which includes pseudo-PEA, is increasingly common and survival remains dismal. We hypothesized that mechanical chest compressions synchronized to native cardiac contractions improve coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) during pseudo-PEA resuscitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a model of pseudo-PEA by infusing high dose esmolol intravenously into anesthetized, intubated, and central arterial and venous catheterized swine to a goal of 45 mm Hg mean arterial blood pressure (MAP). We performed a randomized unblinded repeated crossover trial by administering alternating synchronized and unsynchronized chest compressions for 52 s preceded by 8 s breaks consecutively 4 times. We repeated the protocol approximately 4 times with 1 min breaks. Synchronized compressions were provided 1:1 with native contractions during systole and unsynchronized compressions were provided at 100 beats per minute (BPM). We measured average CPP, MAP, and heartrate (HR) for 5 beats immediately preceding the chest compression onset and for 30 s 10 s after compression onset. We computed the difference in continuous CPP during compressions compared to the immediately preceding baseline for each interval. We developed a mixed linear model with outcome average CPP during compressions minus baseline, fixed variable compression type, and random variable animal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 6 animals. Mean baseline HR was 76.0 BPM, MAP 49.9, and CPP 36.2. Chest compressions increased CPP from baseline an average 1.7 mm Hg when unsynchronized and 5.6 mm Hg synchronized. The adjusted difference was 4.0 mm Hg (95% CI 2.4-5.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Synchronized chest compressions increased CPP 4.0 mm Hg (135%) more than unsynchronized compressions despite a lower compression rate in medication-induced pseudo-PEA. Further refinement and eventual application to patients suffering pseudo-PEA arrest appear warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2463633","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Pulseless electrical activity (PEA) arrest, which includes pseudo-PEA, is increasingly common and survival remains dismal. We hypothesized that mechanical chest compressions synchronized to native cardiac contractions improve coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) during pseudo-PEA resuscitation.

Methods: We developed a model of pseudo-PEA by infusing high dose esmolol intravenously into anesthetized, intubated, and central arterial and venous catheterized swine to a goal of 45 mm Hg mean arterial blood pressure (MAP). We performed a randomized unblinded repeated crossover trial by administering alternating synchronized and unsynchronized chest compressions for 52 s preceded by 8 s breaks consecutively 4 times. We repeated the protocol approximately 4 times with 1 min breaks. Synchronized compressions were provided 1:1 with native contractions during systole and unsynchronized compressions were provided at 100 beats per minute (BPM). We measured average CPP, MAP, and heartrate (HR) for 5 beats immediately preceding the chest compression onset and for 30 s 10 s after compression onset. We computed the difference in continuous CPP during compressions compared to the immediately preceding baseline for each interval. We developed a mixed linear model with outcome average CPP during compressions minus baseline, fixed variable compression type, and random variable animal.

Results: We included 6 animals. Mean baseline HR was 76.0 BPM, MAP 49.9, and CPP 36.2. Chest compressions increased CPP from baseline an average 1.7 mm Hg when unsynchronized and 5.6 mm Hg synchronized. The adjusted difference was 4.0 mm Hg (95% CI 2.4-5.5).

Conclusions: Synchronized chest compressions increased CPP 4.0 mm Hg (135%) more than unsynchronized compressions despite a lower compression rate in medication-induced pseudo-PEA. Further refinement and eventual application to patients suffering pseudo-PEA arrest appear warranted.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信