Adverse drug event profile of pharmacotherapies for alcohol use disorder: a retrospective pharmacovigilance disproportionality analysis study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Kannan Sridharan
{"title":"Adverse drug event profile of pharmacotherapies for alcohol use disorder: a retrospective pharmacovigilance disproportionality analysis study.","authors":"Kannan Sridharan","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2464896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) significantly affects global health, leading to physical deterioration and impacting personal and social relationships. This study aims to evaluate the adverse event profiles (AEP) of three USFDA-approved medications for AUD, acamprosate, disulfiram, and naltrexone, using data from the USFDA Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS).</p><p><strong>Research designs and methods: </strong>Reports related to acamprosate, disulfiram, and naltrexone from March 2004 to March 2024 were extracted from the USFDA AERS database. Data were verified, and disproportionality analysis was conducted using frequentist and Bayesian methods. Adverse events were assessed based on reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, and Bayesian measures. Outcomes such as death, life-threatening events, and hospitalization were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19,177 unique reports were analyzed (naltrexone: <i>n</i> = 18,544; acamprosate: <i>n</i> = 249; disulfiram: <i>n</i> = 384). Common adverse events included hepatobiliary, nervous system, and psychiatric disorders. Disulfiram was associated with coagulopathy and drug interactions, while naltrexone was linked to injection site reactions and hypersensitivity. Naltrexone had higher mortality reports, and disulfiram had more hospitalizations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study underscores the diverse AEPs of these medications, highlighting the need for careful monitoring and individualized treatment to ensure safety and efficacy in managing AUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2464896","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) significantly affects global health, leading to physical deterioration and impacting personal and social relationships. This study aims to evaluate the adverse event profiles (AEP) of three USFDA-approved medications for AUD, acamprosate, disulfiram, and naltrexone, using data from the USFDA Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS).

Research designs and methods: Reports related to acamprosate, disulfiram, and naltrexone from March 2004 to March 2024 were extracted from the USFDA AERS database. Data were verified, and disproportionality analysis was conducted using frequentist and Bayesian methods. Adverse events were assessed based on reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, and Bayesian measures. Outcomes such as death, life-threatening events, and hospitalization were also analyzed.

Results: A total of 19,177 unique reports were analyzed (naltrexone: n = 18,544; acamprosate: n = 249; disulfiram: n = 384). Common adverse events included hepatobiliary, nervous system, and psychiatric disorders. Disulfiram was associated with coagulopathy and drug interactions, while naltrexone was linked to injection site reactions and hypersensitivity. Naltrexone had higher mortality reports, and disulfiram had more hospitalizations.

Conclusion: The study underscores the diverse AEPs of these medications, highlighting the need for careful monitoring and individualized treatment to ensure safety and efficacy in managing AUD.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信