An Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Guideline Adherence in Melanoma.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-16971-0
Amelia Stapleton Van Doren, Hemali Shah, Ashar Ata, Lindy Davis
{"title":"An Evaluation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Guideline Adherence in Melanoma.","authors":"Amelia Stapleton Van Doren, Hemali Shah, Ashar Ata, Lindy Davis","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-16971-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Regional lymph nodes are a common first site of metastasis in patients diagnosed with invasive melanoma. Knowledge of sentinel lymph node status provides strong prognostic information in melanoma and is important for staging and treatment decisions. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network<sup>®</sup> (NCCN) recommends performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for melanoma patients with a T category of ≥T2a. This study aims to assess our academic institution's guideline adherence to improve quality of care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective review of medical records from 2017 to 2023 identified 628 patients referred to our institution for invasive melanoma treatment. Adherence to guidelines was assessed using Chi-square analyses and Fisher's exact tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 8.2% of cases did not follow the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines<sup>®</sup>) for SLNB. When justification provided within the medical record was considered adherent to guidelines, our rate of discordance was 1.6%. Head and neck melanomas were more likely to have guideline-discordant SLNB management, regardless of whether or not a justification was provided.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Greater than 98% of melanoma cases at our institution aligned with the SLNB NCCN Guidelines<sup>®</sup>. We outlined the complex justifications physicians and patients may use to pursue care that is nonadherent to guidelines. Employment of SLNB may be limited by medical comorbidities, surgical risks, and when the management would not change based on the result. Our study provides a blueprint for institutional assessment of guideline adherence and highlights the importance of documentation and guideline dissemination.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"5283-5291"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-16971-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Regional lymph nodes are a common first site of metastasis in patients diagnosed with invasive melanoma. Knowledge of sentinel lymph node status provides strong prognostic information in melanoma and is important for staging and treatment decisions. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN) recommends performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for melanoma patients with a T category of ≥T2a. This study aims to assess our academic institution's guideline adherence to improve quality of care.

Methods: Retrospective review of medical records from 2017 to 2023 identified 628 patients referred to our institution for invasive melanoma treatment. Adherence to guidelines was assessed using Chi-square analyses and Fisher's exact tests.

Results: In total, 8.2% of cases did not follow the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for SLNB. When justification provided within the medical record was considered adherent to guidelines, our rate of discordance was 1.6%. Head and neck melanomas were more likely to have guideline-discordant SLNB management, regardless of whether or not a justification was provided.

Conclusion: Greater than 98% of melanoma cases at our institution aligned with the SLNB NCCN Guidelines®. We outlined the complex justifications physicians and patients may use to pursue care that is nonadherent to guidelines. Employment of SLNB may be limited by medical comorbidities, surgical risks, and when the management would not change based on the result. Our study provides a blueprint for institutional assessment of guideline adherence and highlights the importance of documentation and guideline dissemination.

黑色素瘤前哨淋巴结活检指南依从性的评价。
背景:在浸润性黑色素瘤患者中,区域淋巴结是常见的第一转移部位。前哨淋巴结状态的知识为黑色素瘤的预后提供了强有力的信息,对分期和治疗决策很重要。国家综合癌症网络®(NCCN)推荐对T分类≥T2a的黑色素瘤患者进行前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)。本研究旨在评估我们的学术机构的指导方针,以提高护理质量。方法:回顾性分析2017年至2023年的医疗记录,确定628例转介至我院接受侵袭性黑色素瘤治疗的患者。使用卡方分析和Fisher精确检验评估指南的依从性。结果:总的来说,8.2%的病例没有遵循NCCN肿瘤学临床实践指南(NCCN指南®)的SLNB。当病历中提供的理由被认为符合指南时,我们的不一致性率为1.6%。无论是否提供理由,头颈部黑色素瘤更有可能采用与指南不一致的SLNB治疗。结论:我们机构超过98%的黑色素瘤病例符合SLNB NCCN指南®。我们概述了医生和患者可能使用的复杂理由,以追求不遵守指南的护理。SLNB的使用可能会受到医疗合并症、手术风险以及管理不会因结果而改变的限制。我们的研究为机构评估指南依从性提供了蓝图,并强调了文献和指南传播的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信