Sensitivity analysis of aerosol optical and radiative properties over the climate sensitive Hindu Kush Himalayan region using sky radiometer observation

IF 4.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Shantikumar S. Ningombam , Swagata Mukhopadhyay , B.L. Madhavan , A.K. Srivastava
{"title":"Sensitivity analysis of aerosol optical and radiative properties over the climate sensitive Hindu Kush Himalayan region using sky radiometer observation","authors":"Shantikumar S. Ningombam ,&nbsp;Swagata Mukhopadhyay ,&nbsp;B.L. Madhavan ,&nbsp;A.K. Srivastava","doi":"10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.121008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study examined sensitivity analysis of aerosol optical and radiative properties due to different versions of SKYRAD.pack module (i.e. versions 4.2 and 5.0) along with stability and performance of sky radiometer instruments (POM-01), operating at Hanle, Leh and Merak, located at high-altitude background sites in the most climate sensitive Hindu Kush Himalayan region. The study utilized long-term aerosol measurements during 2008–2024 for examining the stability and performance of the instruments. As a part of sensitivity analysis, coarse-mode aerosol optical depth (AOD) was found to be higher at version 4.2, while fine-mode AOD showed higher at version 5.0, but interestingly the variation of total AOD was found to be insignificant. Further, single scattering albedo (SSA) at version 5.0 was overestimated from 4.2 version. Among the parameters, aerosol asymmetry parameter (AS) showed significantly larger difference between the two versions with overestimation at 4.2 version. Such large differences of AS may be attributed to variations in aerosol radiative forcing parameters. Further, variation of <span><math><mo>±</mo></math></span>2% calibration constants (F0I) in the sensitivity analysis showed significant variation in the retrieval parameters. Aerosol volume size distribution at three sites showed dominantly tri-modal pattern at version 4.2, while version 5.0 showed dominance of bi-modal distribution, which may be attributed from significant variation of AS between the two versions. These findings highlighted the importance of performing calibration procedures frequently to ensure the quality controlled data at background sites in particular, and sensitivity analysis for aerosol retrieval parameters in different versions of the SKYRAD.pack software tool.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":250,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Environment","volume":"344 ","pages":"Article 121008"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1352231024006836","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study examined sensitivity analysis of aerosol optical and radiative properties due to different versions of SKYRAD.pack module (i.e. versions 4.2 and 5.0) along with stability and performance of sky radiometer instruments (POM-01), operating at Hanle, Leh and Merak, located at high-altitude background sites in the most climate sensitive Hindu Kush Himalayan region. The study utilized long-term aerosol measurements during 2008–2024 for examining the stability and performance of the instruments. As a part of sensitivity analysis, coarse-mode aerosol optical depth (AOD) was found to be higher at version 4.2, while fine-mode AOD showed higher at version 5.0, but interestingly the variation of total AOD was found to be insignificant. Further, single scattering albedo (SSA) at version 5.0 was overestimated from 4.2 version. Among the parameters, aerosol asymmetry parameter (AS) showed significantly larger difference between the two versions with overestimation at 4.2 version. Such large differences of AS may be attributed to variations in aerosol radiative forcing parameters. Further, variation of ±2% calibration constants (F0I) in the sensitivity analysis showed significant variation in the retrieval parameters. Aerosol volume size distribution at three sites showed dominantly tri-modal pattern at version 4.2, while version 5.0 showed dominance of bi-modal distribution, which may be attributed from significant variation of AS between the two versions. These findings highlighted the importance of performing calibration procedures frequently to ensure the quality controlled data at background sites in particular, and sensitivity analysis for aerosol retrieval parameters in different versions of the SKYRAD.pack software tool.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Atmospheric Environment
Atmospheric Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
8.00%
发文量
458
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Atmospheric Environment has an open access mirror journal Atmospheric Environment: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. Atmospheric Environment is the international journal for scientists in different disciplines related to atmospheric composition and its impacts. The journal publishes scientific articles with atmospheric relevance of emissions and depositions of gaseous and particulate compounds, chemical processes and physical effects in the atmosphere, as well as impacts of the changing atmospheric composition on human health, air quality, climate change, and ecosystems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信