Adoption of Single-Port Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Increases Utilization of the Retroperitoneal Approach: A Report from the Single-Port Advanced Research Consortium.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Michael Raver, Mutahar Ahmed, Kennedy E Okhawere, Indu Saini, Ruchir Chaturvedi, Milan Patel, Ruben Sauer Calvo, Nicolas A Soputro, Roxana Ramos, Mubashir Billah, Simone Crivellaro, Ahmed M Mansour, Jihad Kaouk, Nirmish Singla, James Porter, Ronney Abaza, Akshay Bhandari, Ashok K Hemal, Phillip M Pierorazio, Benjamin I Chung, Craig G Rogers, Reza Mehrazin, Ketan Badani, Michael Stifelman
{"title":"Adoption of Single-Port Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Increases Utilization of the Retroperitoneal Approach: A Report from the Single-Port Advanced Research Consortium.","authors":"Michael Raver, Mutahar Ahmed, Kennedy E Okhawere, Indu Saini, Ruchir Chaturvedi, Milan Patel, Ruben Sauer Calvo, Nicolas A Soputro, Roxana Ramos, Mubashir Billah, Simone Crivellaro, Ahmed M Mansour, Jihad Kaouk, Nirmish Singla, James Porter, Ronney Abaza, Akshay Bhandari, Ashok K Hemal, Phillip M Pierorazio, Benjamin I Chung, Craig G Rogers, Reza Mehrazin, Ketan Badani, Michael Stifelman","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Retroperitoneal approach for robotic partial nephrectomy (PN) has been shown to offer shorter operative times and hospital stays without differences in complication rates compared with the transperitoneal approach. The single-port (SP) system may be better suited than multiport (MP) for challenges with the retroperitoneal approach such as narrow access geometry. We evaluated if the adoption of SP PN increased the utilization of retroperitoneal approach. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively reviewed an IRB-approved multi-institutional database of all PN from 2013 to 2023. The date of the first SP PN split the cohorts before and after SP adoption. The percentage of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approach cases overall and for SP and MP was determined before and after adoption. Joinpoint analysis assessed changes in rates of the retroperitoneal approach. Logistic regression compared patient and tumor characteristics with retroperitoneal approach PN before and after adoption of SP. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall 1959 patients were evaluated, of which 654 were performed prior versus 1305 after SP adoption. There was an increased percentage of retroperitoneal approach after adoption, with 7.3% (48/654) before compared with 24.8% (324/1305) after adoption. The percentage of the retroperitoneal approach for SP PN was 52.8% (134/254), increasing over time with 75% (24/32) of SP in 2023 performed with a retroperitoneal approach. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The retroperitoneal approach was used more frequently than the transperitoneal approach in the SP cohort. The adoption of SP increased the incidence of the retroperitoneal approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Retroperitoneal approach for robotic partial nephrectomy (PN) has been shown to offer shorter operative times and hospital stays without differences in complication rates compared with the transperitoneal approach. The single-port (SP) system may be better suited than multiport (MP) for challenges with the retroperitoneal approach such as narrow access geometry. We evaluated if the adoption of SP PN increased the utilization of retroperitoneal approach. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed an IRB-approved multi-institutional database of all PN from 2013 to 2023. The date of the first SP PN split the cohorts before and after SP adoption. The percentage of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approach cases overall and for SP and MP was determined before and after adoption. Joinpoint analysis assessed changes in rates of the retroperitoneal approach. Logistic regression compared patient and tumor characteristics with retroperitoneal approach PN before and after adoption of SP. Results: Overall 1959 patients were evaluated, of which 654 were performed prior versus 1305 after SP adoption. There was an increased percentage of retroperitoneal approach after adoption, with 7.3% (48/654) before compared with 24.8% (324/1305) after adoption. The percentage of the retroperitoneal approach for SP PN was 52.8% (134/254), increasing over time with 75% (24/32) of SP in 2023 performed with a retroperitoneal approach. Conclusion: The retroperitoneal approach was used more frequently than the transperitoneal approach in the SP cohort. The adoption of SP increased the incidence of the retroperitoneal approach.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信