Piano level laser therapy versus epidermal growth factor injection for painful myogenic temporomandibular disorder (a randomized clinical trial).

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Passant Osama Qataya, Azza Mohamed Zaki, Fatma Amin, Ahmed Swedan, Hagar Elkafrawy
{"title":"Piano level laser therapy versus epidermal growth factor injection for painful myogenic temporomandibular disorder (a randomized clinical trial).","authors":"Passant Osama Qataya, Azza Mohamed Zaki, Fatma Amin, Ahmed Swedan, Hagar Elkafrawy","doi":"10.1007/s00784-025-06189-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this clinical trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of Piano level laser therapy using Nd-YAG laser and intramuscular EGF injection in pain alleviation, function, and quality of life improvement in patients suffering from myogenic TMD.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A randomized clinical trial was performed on 29 patients suffering from chronic painful myogenic TMD based on diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. Group I (n = 13patients) was treated using 1064 nm Nd-YAG Laser (4 sessions once/week). Group II (n = 14 patients) was treated by intramuscular injection of EGF. Pain using numerical rating score, pain free opening and unassisted maximum opening were measured at baseline, 7,14,21 days, 1 and 3 months. Quality of life using OHIP-14 was assessed at baseline, 1 and 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that there was a significant pain reduction (P < 0.000) and increase in pain free opening (P < 0.0001) in both test groups. However, only group I showed a significant increase in maximum opening (P = 0.007). Quality of life significantly improved in both groups (P = 0.0001). There was no significant difference between the two treatments in pain scores, pain free opening, maximum opening nor quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both treatment modalities offered effective and cost-effective non- to minimally invasive treatment options for myogenic TMD with no side effects.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Myogenic TMD forms a public health issue and is a common musculoskeletal problem causing pain and disability. The proposal of effective, non-invasive, and affordable treatment options can help solve this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 2","pages":"118"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06189-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this clinical trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of Piano level laser therapy using Nd-YAG laser and intramuscular EGF injection in pain alleviation, function, and quality of life improvement in patients suffering from myogenic TMD.

Materials and methods: A randomized clinical trial was performed on 29 patients suffering from chronic painful myogenic TMD based on diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. Group I (n = 13patients) was treated using 1064 nm Nd-YAG Laser (4 sessions once/week). Group II (n = 14 patients) was treated by intramuscular injection of EGF. Pain using numerical rating score, pain free opening and unassisted maximum opening were measured at baseline, 7,14,21 days, 1 and 3 months. Quality of life using OHIP-14 was assessed at baseline, 1 and 3 months.

Results: Results showed that there was a significant pain reduction (P < 0.000) and increase in pain free opening (P < 0.0001) in both test groups. However, only group I showed a significant increase in maximum opening (P = 0.007). Quality of life significantly improved in both groups (P = 0.0001). There was no significant difference between the two treatments in pain scores, pain free opening, maximum opening nor quality of life.

Conclusion: Both treatment modalities offered effective and cost-effective non- to minimally invasive treatment options for myogenic TMD with no side effects.

Clinical relevance: Myogenic TMD forms a public health issue and is a common musculoskeletal problem causing pain and disability. The proposal of effective, non-invasive, and affordable treatment options can help solve this issue.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信